Graduate Program in Pharmacology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Biological Sciences: Biochemistry Toxicology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Camobi, Santa Maria, 97105-900, RS, Brazil.
Inflammopharmacology. 2020 Dec;28(6):1677-1689. doi: 10.1007/s10787-020-00702-w. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
Paclitaxel use in cancer treatment is limited by a painful syndrome that has no effective treatment. Despite new therapies, drugs of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder remain a useful therapeutic tool for cancer pain relief. Since cancer pain is caused by both tumor and chemotherapy, we assessed the efficacy of drugs from the WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain relief in a paclitaxel-induced pain syndrome (P-IPS) model. P-IPS was induced in rats by one or four injections of paclitaxel on alternate days. The acute and chronic phases were assessed 24 h and 15 days after the first paclitaxel injection, respectively. The mechanical allodynia was evaluated after (step 1 of the ladder) paracetamol, (step 2) codeine alone or plus paracetamol and (step 3) morphine treatment in the acute or chronic phase of P-IPS. Paracetamol, codeine and morphine were equally efficacious in reducing the acute phase of the P-IPS. Codeine plus paracetamol had similar efficacy and potency when administered together in the acute phase of the P-IPS, but produced a longer-lasting effect than when separately managed. Moreover, paracetamol, codeine and morphine partially reduced the chronic phase of P-IPS, losing their efficacy and, in the case of codeine, potency when compared to the acute phase. However, paracetamol plus codeine increased the potency and efficacy of the codeine when compared to codeine administered alone in the chronic phase of P-IPS, producing a long-lasting anti-allodynic effect. Together, analgesics of WHO analgesic ladder reduce both acute and chronic phases of P-IPS, with codeine plus paracetamol presenting more potent, efficacious and long-lasting effect. Thus, in addition to tumor pain, drugs of WHO analgesics ladder could also be useful to treat P-IPS.
紫杉醇在癌症治疗中的应用受到一种疼痛综合征的限制,而这种综合征尚无有效的治疗方法。尽管有新的治疗方法,但世界卫生组织(WHO)的镇痛药阶梯仍然是缓解癌症疼痛的有用治疗工具。由于癌症疼痛是由肿瘤和化疗引起的,我们评估了 WHO 镇痛药阶梯中的药物在紫杉醇诱导的疼痛综合征(P-IPS)模型中缓解癌症疼痛的疗效。通过隔日一次给大鼠注射紫杉醇 1 或 4 次来诱导 P-IPS。分别在第一次紫杉醇注射后 24 小时和 15 天评估急性和慢性阶段。在 P-IPS 的急性或慢性阶段,在用阶梯 1 的扑热息痛、(阶梯 2)单独使用可待因或加用扑热息痛以及(阶梯 3)吗啡治疗后评估机械性痛觉过敏。在急性阶段,扑热息痛、可待因和吗啡在减轻 P-IPS 方面同样有效。在 P-IPS 的急性阶段,可待因加扑热息痛联合使用时具有相似的疗效和效力,但作用持续时间比单独使用时更长。此外,扑热息痛、可待因和吗啡部分减轻了 P-IPS 的慢性阶段,与急性阶段相比,其疗效和效力丧失。然而,与单独使用可待因相比,扑热息痛加可待因增加了可待因在 P-IPS 慢性阶段的效力和疗效,产生了持久的抗痛觉过敏作用。总之,WHO 镇痛药阶梯中的镇痛药可减轻 P-IPS 的急性和慢性阶段,可待因加扑热息痛具有更强、更有效和更持久的作用。因此,除了肿瘤疼痛外,WHO 镇痛药阶梯中的药物也可用于治疗 P-IPS。