Suppr超能文献

姿势描记法测量并不能提高识别社区居住的老年跌倒者复发性跌倒的预测能力。

Posturographic measures did not improve the predictive power to identify recurrent falls in community-dwelling elderly fallers.

机构信息

Laboratorio de Estudos do Movimento, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.

Divisao de Geriatria, Faculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Apr 3;75:e1409. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1409. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate if posturography can be considered a recurrent fall predictor in elderly individuals.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 124 subjects aged 60 to 88 years were evaluated and divided into two groups-the recurrent fallers (89) and single fallers (35) groups. Patients' sociodemographic characteristics were assessed, and clinical testing was performed. The functional test assessment instruments used were timed up and go test (TUGT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), five times sit-to-stand test, and Falls Efficacy Scale (to measure fear of falling). Static posturography was performed in a force platform in the following three different situations-eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC), and EO dual task.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the single and recurrent fallers groups regarding the fear of falling, the Geriatric Depression Scale score, the mean speed calculated from the total displacement of the center point of pressure (COP) in all directions with EO, and the root mean square of the displacement from the COP in the mediolateral axis with EC. Based on the hierarchical logistic regression model, none of the studied posturographic variables was capable of significantly increasing the power of differentiation between the recurrent and single fallers groups. Only TUGT with a cognitive distractor (p<0.05) and the BBS (p<0.01) presented with significant independent predictive power.

CONCLUSION

TUGT with a cognitive distractor and the BBS were considered recurrent fall predictors in elderly fallers.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估平衡仪检查能否作为老年人反复跌倒的预测指标。

方法

这是一项横断面研究。共评估了 124 名 60 至 88 岁的受试者,并将其分为两组——反复跌倒组(89 人)和单次跌倒组(35 人)。评估了患者的社会人口学特征,并进行了临床检查。使用的功能测试评估工具包括计时起立行走测试(TUGT)、伯格平衡量表(BBS)、五次坐立测试和跌倒效能量表(用于测量对跌倒的恐惧)。在力平台上进行静态平衡仪检查,包括睁眼(EO)、闭眼(EC)和 EO 双重任务三种不同情况。

结果

在对跌倒的恐惧、老年抑郁量表评分、EO 时计算的总中心点压力(COP)位移的平均速度以及 EC 时 COP 在横轴向的均方根位移方面,单次跌倒组和反复跌倒组之间存在显著差异。基于分层逻辑回归模型,没有一个研究的平衡仪检查变量能够显著增加区分反复跌倒组和单次跌倒组的能力。只有带有认知干扰的 TUGT(p<0.05)和 BBS(p<0.01)具有显著的独立预测能力。

结论

带有认知干扰的 TUGT 和 BBS 被认为是老年人反复跌倒的预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6df/7100920/d7808983052f/cln-75-e1409-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验