Nairoukh Zaid, Jahangir Saira, Adjepong Dennis, Malik Bilal Haider
Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Neuroscience, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Cureus. 2020 Mar 7;12(3):e7201. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7201.
Access sites for coronary intervention have been changing over the last several decades, from the femoral artery to the radial artery and then to the distal radial artery. Distal radial access, which was first used in 2017 and is still not recommended by the guidelines, shows a higher success rate and less complications than other sites; therefore, it might be the future for cardiovascular intervention. In this study, we reviewed almost all of the articles that are related to the distal radial access, from 2017 to present, and summarized the technique, success rate, advantages, disadvantages, and noncardiac use of this access site.
在过去几十年中,冠状动脉介入治疗的穿刺部位一直在变化,从股动脉到桡动脉,再到桡动脉远端。桡动脉远端穿刺于2017年首次使用,目前仍未被指南推荐,但其成功率高于其他部位,并发症也更少;因此,它可能是心血管介入治疗的未来方向。在本研究中,我们回顾了从2017年至今几乎所有与桡动脉远端穿刺相关的文章,并总结了该穿刺部位的技术、成功率、优点、缺点及非心脏应用情况。