Inomata Takenori, Nakamura Masahiro, Iwagami Masao, Midorikawa-Inomata Akie, Okumura Yuichi, Fujimoto Keiichi, Iwata Nanami, Eguchi Atsuko, Shokirova Hurramhon, Miura Maria, Fujio Kenta, Nagino Ken, Nojiri Shuko, Murakami Akira
Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 1130033, Japan.
Department of Strategic Operating Room Management and Improvement, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 1130033, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Apr 7;10(4):203. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10040203.
The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) between the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (J-OSDI) and the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS). A total of 169 participants were enrolled between September 2017 and May 2018. Patients were administered the J-OSDI and DEQS questionnaires at their first (baseline) and follow-up visits to evaluate DED-related symptoms. The correlations between the J-OSDI total score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) scores were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and their clinical differences were assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. At the baseline visit, the J-OSDI score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) were significantly correlated ( = 0.855, = 0.897, respectively). Moreover, a significant correlation was found between the J-OSDI score and DEQS (Frequency and Degree) at the follow-up visit ( = 0.852, = 0.888, respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a difference (bias) of 4.18 units at the baseline and 4.08 units at the follow-up between the scores of the two questionnaires. The J-OSDI and DEQS were significantly correlated with negligible score differences, suggesting that the J-OSDI can be reliably used for Japanese patients, allowing for cross-country comparisons.
本研究的目的是比较日本版眼表疾病指数(J-OSDI)和干眼相关生活质量评分(DEQS)中患者报告的干眼疾病(DED)症状。2017年9月至2018年5月期间共招募了169名参与者。患者在首次(基线)和随访就诊时接受J-OSDI和DEQS问卷,以评估与DED相关的症状。使用Pearson相关系数评估J-OSDI总分与DEQS(频率和程度)评分之间的相关性,并使用Bland-Altman分析评估它们的临床差异。在基线就诊时,J-OSDI评分与DEQS(频率和程度)显著相关(分别为 = 0.855, = 0.897)。此外,在随访就诊时,J-OSDI评分与DEQS(频率和程度)之间也发现显著相关性(分别为 = 0.852, = 0.888)。Bland-Altman分析显示,两份问卷得分在基线时的差异(偏差)为4.18个单位,随访时为4.08个单位。J-OSDI和DEQS显著相关,得分差异可忽略不计,这表明J-OSDI可可靠地用于日本患者,便于进行跨国比较。