Tullis Jonathan G, Goldstone Robert L
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Arizona, 1430 E. Second St., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Apr 9;5(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5.
In peer instruction, instructors pose a challenging question to students, students answer the question individually, students work with a partner in the class to discuss their answers, and finally students answer the question again. A large body of evidence shows that peer instruction benefits student learning. To determine the mechanism for these benefits, we collected semester-long data from six classes, involving a total of 208 undergraduate students being asked a total of 86 different questions related to their course content. For each question, students chose their answer individually, reported their confidence, discussed their answers with their partner, and then indicated their possibly revised answer and confidence again. Overall, students were more accurate and confident after discussion than before. Initially correct students were more likely to keep their answers than initially incorrect students, and this tendency was partially but not completely attributable to differences in confidence. We discuss the benefits of peer instruction in terms of differences in the coherence of explanations, social learning, and the contextual factors that influence confidence and accuracy.
在同伴教学中,教师向学生提出一个具有挑战性的问题,学生先独立回答问题,然后在课堂上与同伴合作讨论他们的答案,最后学生再次回答该问题。大量证据表明同伴教学有益于学生的学习。为了确定这些益处的机制,我们收集了六个班级长达一个学期的数据,涉及总共208名本科生,他们总共被问到了86个与课程内容相关的不同问题。对于每个问题,学生先独立选择答案,报告自己的信心程度,然后与同伴讨论答案,接着再次给出可能修改后的答案并再次报告信心程度。总体而言,学生在讨论后比讨论前回答得更准确且更有信心。最初回答正确的学生比最初回答错误的学生更有可能保留自己的答案,这种趋势部分但并非完全归因于信心程度的差异。我们从解释的连贯性差异、社会学习以及影响信心和准确性的情境因素等方面讨论了同伴教学的益处。