Suppr超能文献

单一菌株益生菌与多菌株混合物的功效:菌株和疾病特异性的系统评价

Efficacy of Single-Strain Probiotics Versus Multi-Strain Mixtures: Systematic Review of Strain and Disease Specificity.

作者信息

McFarland Lynne V

机构信息

Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 6047 38th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Mar;66(3):694-704. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06244-z. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

Abstract

The diversity of probiotic products makes choosing an appropriate probiotic challenging. One unanswered question is whether single-strain probiotics are more effective than multi-strain mixtures. The aim of this review is to account for both disease and strain specificity to determine whether single strains or multiple strains are equivalent or more effective. This literature review of randomized controlled trials from 1973 to 2019 was used to compare the pooled efficacy of trials with a single strain versus the probiotic mixture with same matched strain within the same type of disease indication. A total of 65 RCTs were included (41 with single strains, 22 multi-strain mixtures and 2 comparing single strain to mixture arms) for eight different disease indications (N = 10,863). Only three strains (L. rhamnosus GG, L. helveticus R52 and B. lactis Bb12) had corresponding trials with matching mixtures. Use of L. rhamnosus GG only was significantly more protective for necrotizing enterocolitis compared to two mixtures also containing different strains of B. lactis. The mixture of L. rhamnosus GG and B. lactis Bb12 was significantly more effective than L. rhamnosus GG alone for the eradication of H. pylori. In most cases, single strains were equivalent to mixtures. Choice of an appropriate probiotic should be based, not on the number of strains in the product, rather based on evidence-based trials of efficacy. In most cases, multi-strain mixtures were not significantly more effective than single-strain probiotics.

摘要

益生菌产品的多样性使得选择合适的益生菌具有挑战性。一个尚未得到解答的问题是,单菌株益生菌是否比多菌株混合物更有效。本综述的目的是考虑疾病和菌株的特异性,以确定单菌株或多菌株是否等效或更有效。本对1973年至2019年随机对照试验的文献综述用于比较同一疾病适应症中单一菌株试验与具有相同匹配菌株的益生菌混合物的综合疗效。总共纳入了65项随机对照试验(41项针对单菌株,22项针对多菌株混合物,2项比较单菌株与混合物组),涉及八种不同的疾病适应症(N = 10863)。只有三种菌株(鼠李糖乳杆菌GG、瑞士乳杆菌R52和双歧杆菌Bb12)有与之匹配的混合物的相应试验。与另外两种也含有不同双歧杆菌菌株的混合物相比,仅使用鼠李糖乳杆菌GG对坏死性小肠结肠炎的保护作用明显更强。鼠李糖乳杆菌GG和双歧杆菌Bb12的混合物在根除幽门螺杆菌方面比单独使用鼠李糖乳杆菌GG明显更有效。在大多数情况下,单菌株与混合物等效。选择合适的益生菌应基于产品疗效的循证试验,而不是基于产品中的菌株数量。在大多数情况下,多菌株混合物并不比单菌株益生菌明显更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验