Cooper Peter, Bolton Keith D, Velaphi Sithembiso, de Groot Nanda, Emady-Azar Shahram, Pecquet Sophie, Steenhout Philippe
University of Witwatersrand & Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of Witwatersrand & Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2017 Jan 8;10:119-130. doi: 10.4137/CMPed.S40134. eCollection 2016.
The gut microbiota of infants is shaped by both the mode of delivery and the type of feeding. The gut of vaginally and cesarean-delivered infants is colonized at different rates and with different bacterial species, leading to differences in the gut microbial composition, which may persist up to 6 months. In a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial conducted in South Africa, we tested the effect of a formula supplemented with a prebiotic (a mixture of bovine milk-derived oligosaccharides [BMOS] generated from whey permeate and containing galactooligosaccharides and milk oligosaccharides such as 3'- and 6'-sialyllactose) and the probiotic subsp. () strain CNCM I-3446 on the bifidobacteria levels in the gut of infants born vaginally or via cesarean section in early life. Additionally, the safety of the new formulation was evaluated. A total of 430 healthy, full-term infants born to HIV-positive mothers who had elected to feed their child beginning from birth (≤3 days old) exclusively with formula were randomized into this multicenter trial of four parallel groups. A total of 421 infants who had any study formula intake were included in the full analysis set (FAS). The first two groups consisted of cesarean-delivered infants assigned to the Test formula (n = 92) (a starter infant formula [IF] containing BMOS at a total oligosaccharide concentration of 5.8 ± 1.0 g/100 g of powder formula [8 g/L in the reconstituted formula] + [1 × 10 colony-forming units {cfu}/g]) or a Control IF (n = 101); the second two groups consisted of vaginally delivered infants randomized to the same Test (n = 115) or Control (n = 113) formulas from the time of enrollment to 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome was fecal bifidobacteria count at 10 days, and the primary safety outcome was daily weight gain (g/d) between 10 days and 4 months. At 10 days, fecal bifidobacteria counts were significantly higher in the Test formula than in the Control formula group among infants with cesarean birth (median [range] log: 9.41 [6.30-10.94] cfu/g versus 6.30 [6.30-10.51] cfu/g; = 0.002) but not among those with vaginal birth (median [range] log: 10.06 [5.93-10.77] cfu/g versus 9.85 [6.15-10.79] cfu/g; = 0.126). The lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the difference in the mean daily weight gain between the Test and Control formula groups was more than -3 g/d in both the vaginally and cesarean-delivered infants, indicating that growth in the Test formula-fed infants was not inferior to that of Control formula-fed infants. At 10 days and 4 weeks, the fecal pH of infants fed the Test formula was significantly lower than in those fed the Control formula, irrespective of mode of delivery: for vaginal delivery: 4.93 versus 5.59; < 0.001 (10 days) and 5.01 versus 5.71; < 0.001 (4 weeks); for cesarean delivery: 5.14 versus 5.65, = 0.009 (10 days) and 5.06 versus 5.75, < 0.001 (4 weeks). At 3 months, this acidification effect only persisted among cesarean-born infants. IF supplemented with the prebiotic BMOS and probiotic induced a strong bifidogenic effect in both delivering modes, but more explicitly correcting the low bifidobacteria level found in cesarean-born infants from birth. The supplemented IF lowered the fecal pH and improved the fecal microbiota in both normal and cesarean-delivered infants. The use of bifidobacteria as a probiotic even in infants who are immunologically at risk is safe and well tolerated.
婴儿的肠道微生物群受到分娩方式和喂养类型的共同影响。经阴道分娩和剖宫产的婴儿肠道被不同细菌种类以不同速率定植,导致肠道微生物组成存在差异,这种差异可能持续长达6个月。在南非进行的一项多中心、随机、对照、双盲试验中,我们测试了一种添加了益生元(一种由乳清渗透物产生的牛乳来源的低聚糖[BMOS]混合物,含有低聚半乳糖和牛奶低聚糖,如3'-和6'-唾液酸乳糖)和益生菌亚种()菌株CNCM I - 3446的配方奶粉对早期经阴道分娩或剖宫产出生婴儿肠道中双歧杆菌水平的影响。此外,还评估了新配方奶粉的安全性。共有430名健康的足月婴儿,其母亲为HIV阳性,她们选择从出生(≤3天)开始仅用配方奶粉喂养孩子,这些婴儿被随机分为四个平行组进行这项多中心试验。共有421名摄入过任何研究配方奶粉的婴儿被纳入全分析集(FAS)。前两组由剖宫产出生的婴儿组成,分别分配到试验配方奶粉组(n = 92)(一种起始婴儿配方奶粉[IF],总低聚糖浓度为5.8±1.0 g/100 g奶粉[复配配方中为8 g/L] + [1×10菌落形成单位{cfu}/g])或对照IF组(n = 101);后两组由经阴道分娩的婴儿组成,从入组到6个月随机分配到相同的试验(n = 115)或对照(n = 113)配方奶粉组。主要疗效指标是10天时的粪便双歧杆菌计数,主要安全性指标是10天至4个月期间的每日体重增加(g/d)。在剖宫产出生的婴儿中,10天时试验配方奶粉组的粪便双歧杆菌计数显著高于对照配方奶粉组(中位数[范围]对数:9.41[6.30 - 10.94]cfu/g对6.30[6.30 - 10.51]cfu/g;P = 0.002),但在经阴道分娩的婴儿中并非如此(中位数[范围]对数:10.06[5.93 - 10.77]cfu/g对9.85[6.15 - 10.79]cfu/g;P = 0.126)。试验配方奶粉组和对照配方奶粉组之间平均每日体重增加差异的双侧95%置信区间下限在经阴道分娩和剖宫产的婴儿中均大于 - 3 g/d,这表明食用试验配方奶粉的婴儿生长情况不劣于食用对照配方奶粉的婴儿。在10天和4周时,无论分娩方式如何,食用试验配方奶粉的婴儿粪便pH均显著低于食用对照配方奶粉的婴儿:经阴道分娩:4.93比5.59;P < 0.001(10天)和5.01比5.71;P < 0.001(4周);剖宫产:5.14比5.65,P = 0.009(10天)和5.06比5.75,P < 0.001(4周)。在3个月时,这种酸化作用仅在剖宫产出生的婴儿中持续存在。添加了益生元BMOS和益生菌的IF在两种分娩方式中均诱导了强烈的双歧杆菌生成作用,但更明显地纠正了剖宫产出生婴儿出生时发现的低双歧杆菌水平。添加的IF降低了正常分娩和剖宫产婴儿的粪便pH并改善了粪便微生物群。即使在免疫风险较高的婴儿中使用双歧杆菌作为益生菌也是安全且耐受性良好的。