Bighelli Irene, Leucht Claudia, Huhn Maximilian, Reitmeir Cornelia, Schwermann Felicitas, Wallis Sofia, Davis John M, Leucht Stefan
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Schizophr Bull. 2020 Apr 10;46(3):496-504. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz090.
We examined patient and study characteristics of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy trials to establish whether the effects of these 2 treatment strategies can be compared meaningfully.
We inspected all randomized controlled trials included in 2 recent meta-analyses on antipsychotics and psychotherapy in patients with positive symptoms of schizophrenia, searching EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Differences between psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy trials were analyzed with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests.
Eighty studies with 18 271 participants on antipsychotic drugs and 53 studies with 4068 participants on psychotherapy were included. Psychotherapy studies included less severely ill patients (P < .0001), with a shorter duration of illness (P = .021), lasted for a longer period (P < .0001), administered the intervention as add-on to antipsychotics (P < .0001), had higher risk of bias in some domains including blinding of outcome assessment (P < .0001), and were funded publicly more frequently (P < .0001). Antipsychotic trials had larger sample sizes (P < .0001) and more study centers (P < .0001), included more males (P = .0001), inpatients (P < .0001), and slightly older patients (P = .031), more often used diagnostic operationalized criteria (P = .006), and were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. They did not differ in conflict of interest (P = .24).
We found key differences between the 2 groups of studies that encompass higher risk of bias in psychotherapy studies and the inclusion of more severe patients in drug trials. These differences imply that study and patient characteristics should be carefully taken into account before considering a network meta-analysis. In the interest of patients, psychopharmacologists and psychotherapists should optimize their treatments rather than seeing them in competition.
我们研究了药物治疗和心理治疗试验的患者及研究特征,以确定这两种治疗策略的效果是否可以进行有意义的比较。
我们查阅了最近两项关于精神分裂症阳性症状患者抗精神病药物和心理治疗的荟萃分析中纳入的所有随机对照试验,检索了EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov。采用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验和卡方检验分析心理治疗和药物治疗试验之间的差异。
纳入了80项有18271名参与者的抗精神病药物研究和53项有4068名参与者的心理治疗研究。心理治疗研究纳入的病情较轻的患者较少(P <.0001),病程较短(P =.021),持续时间较长(P <.0001),将干预作为抗精神病药物的附加治疗(P <.0001),在包括结局评估盲法在内的一些领域存在较高的偏倚风险(P <.0001),并且更频繁地由公共资金资助(P <.0001)。抗精神病药物试验的样本量更大(P <.0001),研究中心更多(P <.0001),纳入的男性更多(P =.0001)、住院患者更多(P <.0001)以及年龄稍大的患者更多(P =.031),更常使用诊断操作性标准(P =.006),并且由制药公司赞助。它们在利益冲突方面没有差异(P =.24)。
我们发现两组研究之间存在关键差异,包括心理治疗研究中较高的偏倚风险以及药物试验中纳入病情更严重的患者。这些差异意味着在考虑进行网状荟萃分析之前,应仔细考虑研究和患者特征。为了患者的利益,精神药理学家和心理治疗师应优化他们的治疗方法,而不是将它们视为相互竞争的关系。