Methodologic Guidance and Expectations for the Development and Reporting of Prediction Models and Causal Inference Studies.
作者信息
Harhay Michael O, Au David H, Dell Sharon D, Gould Michael K, Redline Susan, Ryerson Christopher J, Cooke Colin R
机构信息
Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center and.
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
出版信息
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jun;17(6):679-682. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-141ED.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Methodologic Guidance and Expectations for the Development and Reporting of Prediction Models and Causal Inference Studies.预测模型与因果推断研究的开发和报告的方法学指南及期望
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jun;17(6):679-682. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-141ED.
2
Guidance on Statistical Reporting to Help Improve Your Chances of a Favorable Statistical Review.统计报告指南，助您提高获得有利统计评审的几率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 1;201(9):1035-1038. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0477ED.
3
New Guidelines for Data Reporting and Statistical Analysis: Helping Authors With Transparency and Rigor in Research.数据报告与统计分析新指南：助力作者提升研究的透明度与严谨性
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Nov;34(11):1981-1984. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3885. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
4
Editor's choice: February 2021.编辑推荐：2021年2月。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:A6-A7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.12.026.
5
The end of scientific articles as we know them?我们所熟知的科学论文的终结？
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:276. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
6
Improving the reporting and usability of research studies.提高研究报告的质量和研究的可用性。
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;60(4):337-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9895-9. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
7
Statistical and data reporting guidelines for the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery.《欧洲心胸外科杂志》及《交互式心血管与胸外科手术》的统计与数据报告指南。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Aug;48(2):180-93. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv168. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
An update on data reporting standards.数据报告标准的最新情况。
Nat Cell Biol. 2014 May;16(5):385. doi: 10.1038/ncb2964.
9
CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement.用于报告单病例试验（CENT）的CONSORT扩展版2015声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.生物医学研究文章中你也能发现的20个统计错误。
Croat Med J. 2004 Aug;45(4):361-70.
引用本文的文献
1
Evidence-based personalised medicine in critical care: a framework for quantifying and applying individualised treatment effects in patients who are critically ill.重症监护中基于证据的个性化医疗：一种用于量化和应用重症患者个体化治疗效果的框架。
Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Jun;13(6):556-568. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00054-2. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Consistency of causal claims in observational studies: a review of papers published in a general medical journal.观察性研究中因果关系结论的一致性：一篇发表于普通医学杂志论文的综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 20;11(5):e043339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043339.
3
Computerized Mortality Prediction for Community-acquired Pneumonia at 117 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.117 家退伍军人事务医疗中心社区获得性肺炎的计算机化死亡率预测。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Jul;18(7):1175-1184. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202011-1372OC.
4
Timing Is Everything. The Importance of Alignment of Time Anchors for Observational Causal Inference Research.时机至关重要。时间锚点对齐在观察性因果推断研究中的重要性。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):769-772. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1163VP.
本文引用的文献
1
Development and Reporting of Prediction Models: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals.预测模型的制定和报告：呼吸、睡眠和危重病期刊编辑给作者的指南。
Crit Care Med. 2020 May;48(5):623-633. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004246.
2
Addressing Bias in Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.应对医疗保健领域人工智能中的偏见问题。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 24;322(24):2377-2378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18058.
3
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
4
Reconsidering the Consequences of Using Race to Estimate Kidney Function.重新审视使用种族来估算肾功能的后果。
JAMA. 2019 Jul 9;322(2):113-114. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5774.
5
Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity.确保机器学习的公正性，以促进健康公平。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 18;169(12):866-872. doi: 10.7326/M18-1990. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
6
Machine Learning, Health Disparities, and Causal Reasoning.机器学习、健康差异与因果推理
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 18;169(12):883-884. doi: 10.7326/M18-3297. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
7
Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals.因果推断研究中的混杂因素控制与结果报告。呼吸、睡眠和重症监护期刊编辑给作者的指南。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jan;16(1):22-28. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201808-564PS.
8
Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data.利用电子健康记录数据的机器学习算法中的潜在偏差。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1544-1547. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763.
9
The C-Word: The More We Discuss It, the Less Dirty It Sounds.“癌症”这个词：我们讨论得越多，它听起来就不那么忌讳了。
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):625-626. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304392.
10
The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data.C 字当头：科学委婉语无助于从观察性数据中进行因果推断。
Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):616-619. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304337. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Zotero 插件