• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Timing Is Everything. The Importance of Alignment of Time Anchors for Observational Causal Inference Research.

作者信息

Taylor Stephanie Parks, Kowalkowski Marc A, Admon Andrew J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health's Carolinas Medical Center, and.

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; and.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):769-772. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1163VP.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1163VP
PMID:33217239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8086541/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Timing Is Everything. The Importance of Alignment of Time Anchors for Observational Causal Inference Research.时机至关重要。时间锚点对齐在观察性因果推断研究中的重要性。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):769-772. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1163VP.
2
The Taboo Against Explicit Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Psychology.非实验心理学中对明确因果推论的禁忌。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;15(5):1243-1255. doi: 10.1177/1745691620921521. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
3
A Narrative Review of Methods for Causal Inference and Associated Educational Resources.因果推断方法及相关教育资源的叙述性综述。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Oct/Dec;29(4):260-269. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000276.
4
Causal inference from observational data.从观察数据进行因果推断。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;44(5):409-15. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12231. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
5
Causal inference in dentistry: Time to move forward.牙科中的因果推断：是时候向前迈进了。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;51(1):62-66. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12802. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
6
The only thing that can stop bad causal inference is good causal inference.唯一能阻止错误因果推断的是正确的因果推断。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 May 13;45:e91. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000789.
7
Strengthening Association through Causal Inference.通过因果推理加强关联。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):899-907. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010305. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
8
[Application of mendelian randomization methods in causal inference of observational study].孟德尔随机化方法在观察性研究因果推断中的应用
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 6;53(6):619-624. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.06.015.
9
Modernizing the Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causal relationships in observational data.将 Bradford Hill 因果关系评估标准现代化，用于观察性数据。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 Sep;48(8):682-712. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1518404. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
Causal inference and developmental psychology.因果推断与发展心理学。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Nov;46(6):1454-80. doi: 10.1037/a0020204.

引用本文的文献

1
Two Weeks Versus One Week of Maximal Patient-Intensivist Continuity for Adult Medical Intensive Care Patients: A Two-Center Target Trial Emulation.两周与一周最大程度的患者-重症监护医生连续性对成年重症监护患者的影响：一项两中心目标试验模拟研究。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 1;52(9):1323-1332. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006322. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Beyond Confounding: Identifying Selection Bias in Observational Pulmonary and Critical Care Research.超越混杂因素：识别观察性肺部和重症医学研究中的选择偏倚
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Jul;19(7):1084-1089. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202110-1188PS.
3
Accurately Measuring Preventable Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Deaths Using Observational Data: It's about Time.利用观察性数据准确测量可预防的呼吸机相关性肺炎死亡人数：是时候了。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):777-779. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202102-126ED.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-arm Trials with Historical Controls: Study Designs to Avoid Time-related Biases.单臂试验与历史对照：避免时间相关偏倚的研究设计。
Epidemiology. 2021 Jan;32(1):94-100. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001267.
2
Time-related biases in pharmacoepidemiology.药物流行病学中的时间相关偏倚。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1101-1110. doi: 10.1002/pds.5083. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
Methodologic Guidance and Expectations for the Development and Reporting of Prediction Models and Causal Inference Studies.预测模型与因果推断研究的开发和报告的方法学指南及期望
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jun;17(6):679-682. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-141ED.
4
Benchmarking Observational Analyses Against Randomized Trials: a Review of Studies Assessing Propensity Score Methods.基于随机对照试验的观察性分析的基准测试：评估倾向评分方法的研究综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1396-1404. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05713-5. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Guidance on Statistical Reporting to Help Improve Your Chances of a Favorable Statistical Review.统计报告指南，助您提高获得有利统计评审的几率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 1;201(9):1035-1038. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0477ED.
6
Identifying Clinical Research Priorities in Adult Pulmonary and Critical Care. NHLBI Working Group Report.确定成人肺部与重症监护领域的临床研究重点。美国国立心肺血液研究所工作组报告。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 15;202(4):511-523. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1595WS.
7
The Magic of Randomization versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence.随机化的魔力与真实世界证据的神话
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):674-678. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1901642.
8
Which Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine Have Shown Reduced Mortality? A Systematic Review.哪些重症监护医学多中心随机对照试验显示降低了死亡率？系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):1680-1691. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004000.
9
Emulating a Novel Clinical Trial Using Existing Observational Data. Predicting Results of the PreVent Study.使用现有观察性数据模拟一项新的临床试验。预测 PreVent 研究的结果。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Aug;16(8):998-1007. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-241OC.
10
The Future of Critical Care Lies in Quality Improvement and Education.重症监护的未来在于质量改进和教育。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jun;16(6):649-656. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201812-847IP.