Suppr超能文献

无创通气不适用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的高强度耐力运动。

NIV Is not Adequate for High Intensity Endurance Exercise in COPD.

作者信息

Bonnevie Tristan, Gravier Francis-Edouard, Fresnel Emeline, Kerfourn Adrien, Medrinal Clément, Prieur Guillaume, Combret Yann, Muir Jean-François, Cuvelier Antoine, Debeaumont David, Reychler Gregory, Patout Maxime, Viacroze Catherine

机构信息

Normandie University, UNIROUEN, UPRES EA 3830, Rouen university hospital, Haute Normandie Research and Biomedical Innovation, 76000 Rouen, France.

ADIR Association, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 8;9(4):1054. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041054.

Abstract

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during exercise has been suggested to sustain higher training intensity but the type of NIV interface, patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) or technological limitation of the ventilator may interfere with exercise. We assessed whether these parameters affect endurance exercise capacity in severe COPD patients. In total, 21 patients with severe COPD not eligible to home NIV performed three constant workload tests. The first test was carried out on spontaneous breathing (SB) and the following ones with NIV and a nasal or oronasal mask in a randomized order. PVA and indicators of ventilator performance were assessed through a comprehensive analysis of the flow pressure tracing raw data from the ventilator. The time limit was significantly reduced with both masks (406 s (197-666), 240 s (131-385) and 189 s (115-545), < 0.01 for tests in SB, with oronasal and nasal mask, respectively). There were few PVA with an oronasal mask (median: 3.4% (1.7-5.2)) but the ventilator reached its maximal generating capacity (median flowmax: 208.0 L/s (189.5-224.8) while inspiratory pressure dropped throughout exercise (from 10.1 (9.4-11.4) to 8.8 cmH2O (8.6-10.8), < 0.01). PVA were more frequent with nasal mask (median: 12.8% (3.2-31.6), < 0.01). Particularly, the proportion of patients with ineffective efforts > 10% was significantly higher with nasal interface (0% versus 33.3%, < 0.01). NIV did not effectively improve endurance capacity in COPD patients not acclimated to home NIV. This was due to a technological limitation of the ventilator for the oronasal mask and the consequence either of an insufficient pressure support or a technological limitation for the nasal mask.

摘要

运动期间的无创通气(NIV)被认为可以维持更高的训练强度,但NIV接口类型、患者-呼吸机不同步(PVA)或呼吸机的技术限制可能会干扰运动。我们评估了这些参数是否会影响重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的耐力运动能力。总共21例不符合家庭NIV条件的重度COPD患者进行了三项恒定工作量测试。第一次测试在自主呼吸(SB)状态下进行,随后的测试使用NIV并随机佩戴鼻罩或口鼻面罩。通过对呼吸机流量压力描记原始数据的全面分析来评估PVA和呼吸机性能指标。两种面罩的时限均显著缩短(SB状态下测试为406秒(197 - 666),使用口鼻面罩和鼻罩时分别为240秒(131 - 385)和189秒(115 - 545),P < 0.01)。使用口鼻面罩时PVA较少(中位数:3.4%(1.7 - 5.2)),但呼吸机达到了其最大产生能力(最大流量中位数:208.0升/秒(189.5 - 224.8)),而吸气压力在整个运动过程中下降(从10.1(9.4 - 11.4)降至8.8厘米水柱(8.6 - 10.8),P < 0.01)。使用鼻罩时PVA更频繁(中位数:12.8%(3.2 - 31.6),P < 0.01)。特别是,无效努力>10%的患者比例在使用鼻接口时显著更高(0%对33.3%,P < 0.01)。NIV未能有效提高未适应家庭NIV的COPD患者的耐力能力。这是由于口鼻面罩的呼吸机技术限制以及鼻罩压力支持不足或技术限制的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c8/7230463/ac8826cef721/jcm-09-01054-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验