• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心房颤动患者的抗栓策略:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析

Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Chua Su-Kiat, Chen Lung-Ching, Shyu Kou-Gi, Cheng Jun-Jack, Hung Huei-Fong, Chiu Chiung-Zuan, Lin Chiu-Mei

机构信息

School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei 111, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 8;9(4):1062. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041062.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9041062
PMID:32276535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7231136/
Abstract

Up to 10% of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews for randomized control trials that studied the safety and efficacy of different antithrombotic strategies in these patients. Six studies, including 12,158 patients were included. Compared to that in the triple antithrombotic therapy group (vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus P2Y inhibitor and aspirin), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding was significantly reduced in the dual antithrombotic therapy (non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) plus P2Y inhibitor) group by 47% (Odds ratio (OR), 0.53; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.35-0.78; I = 0%). Besides, NOAC plus a P2Y inhibitor was associated with less intracranial hemorrhage compared to VKA plus single antiplatelet therapy (OR: 0.20, 95% CrI: 0.05-0.77). There was no significant difference in the trial-defined major adverse cardiac events or the individual outcomes of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or stent thrombosis among all antithrombotic strategies. In conclusion, antithrombotic strategy of NOACs plus P2Y inhibitor is safer than, and as effective as, the strategies including aspirin when used in AF patients undergoing PCI.

摘要

高达10%的心房颤动(AF)患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。通过检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane系统评价数据库,对研究这些患者不同抗栓策略安全性和有效性的随机对照试验进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析。纳入了6项研究,共12158例患者。与三联抗栓治疗组(维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)加P2Y抑制剂和阿司匹林)相比,双联抗栓治疗组(非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOACs)加P2Y抑制剂)的心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)大出血显著减少47%(比值比(OR),0.53;95%可信区间[CrI],0.35 - 0.78;I² = 0%)。此外,与VKA加单一抗血小板治疗相比,NOAC加P2Y抑制剂的颅内出血较少(OR:0.20,95% CrI:0.05 - 0.77)。在所有抗栓策略中,试验定义的主要不良心脏事件或全因死亡、心血管死亡、心肌梗死、中风或支架血栓形成的个体结局均无显著差异。总之,在接受PCI的AF患者中,NOAC加P2Y抑制剂的抗栓策略比包括阿司匹林的策略更安全,且效果相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/dca219ef0871/jcm-09-01062-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/8f0909c52a10/jcm-09-01062-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/685f60e48cc4/jcm-09-01062-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/efdd01842595/jcm-09-01062-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/b47c26311f75/jcm-09-01062-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/dca219ef0871/jcm-09-01062-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/8f0909c52a10/jcm-09-01062-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/685f60e48cc4/jcm-09-01062-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/efdd01842595/jcm-09-01062-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/b47c26311f75/jcm-09-01062-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4992/7231136/dca219ef0871/jcm-09-01062-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心房颤动患者的抗栓策略:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 8;9(4):1062. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041062.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者抗栓策略的安全性和疗效:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):747-755. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1880.
3
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Eight Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.八种抗血栓治疗方案用于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的房颤患者的比较安全性和有效性
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 21;9:832164. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.832164. eCollection 2022.
4
Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Network Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者的最佳抗栓治疗方案:一项更新的网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):582-589. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6175.
5
Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) Versus Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) for Atrial Fibrillation with Elective or Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis with a Particular Focus on Combination Type.非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOAC)与维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)用于伴有择期或紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动:一项特别关注联合类型的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 14;9(4):1120. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041120.
6
Clinical Outcomes of Antithrombotic Strategies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后房颤患者抗栓策略的临床结局
Int Heart J. 2019 May 30;60(3):546-553. doi: 10.1536/ihj.18-464. Epub 2019 May 17.
7
Revisiting the effects of omitting aspirin in combined antithrombotic therapies for atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes or percutaneous coronary interventions: meta-analysis of pooled data from the PIONEER AF-PCI, RE-DUAL PCI, and AUGUSTUS trials.重新探讨在心房颤动和急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中联合抗血栓治疗中省略阿司匹林的影响:来自 PIONEER AF-PCI、RE-DUAL PCI 和 AUGUSTUS 试验的汇总数据的荟萃分析。
Europace. 2020 Jan 1;22(1):33-46. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz259.
8
Optimisation of oral anticoagulants for patients with atrial fibrillation within 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention: A -analysis and systematic review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后12个月内心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂的优化:A分析与系统评价。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Aug 2;36:100850. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100850. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Antithrombotic strategies in patients needing oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.需要口服抗凝治疗的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的抗血栓策略:一项网状荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;97(4):581-588. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29192. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Double Antithrombotic Therapy With Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂双联抗栓治疗在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者中的安全性和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 18;9(16):e017212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017212. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Cultural Translation into Brazilian Portuguese and Validation of the Oral Anticoagulation Knowledge Tool (AKT-Br).跨文化翻译为巴西葡萄牙语并验证口服抗凝知识工具(AKT-Br)。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 May 23;37(3):356-369. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0731.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and efficacy outcomes of double vs. triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant-based randomized clinical trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心房颤动患者双联与三联抗栓治疗的安全性和疗效结局:基于非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Dec 7;40(46):3757-3767. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz732.
2
Edoxaban-based versus vitamin K antagonist-based antithrombotic regimen after successful coronary stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENTRUST-AF PCI): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial.依度沙班与维生素 K 拮抗剂在房颤患者成功经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗栓治疗方案的比较(ENTRUST-AF PCI):一项随机、开放标签、3b 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1335-1343. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31872-0. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者抗栓策略的安全性和疗效:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):747-755. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1880.
4
Antithrombotic Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI in Atrial Fibrillation.心房颤动急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的抗血栓治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1509-1524. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817083. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
5
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 9;74(1):104-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
6
Antithrombotic Regimens in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Whom an Anticoagulant Is Indicated: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.需要使用抗凝剂的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的抗栓方案:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 19;9:1322. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01322. eCollection 2018.
7
'Ten Commandments' for the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南的“十诫”
Eur Heart J. 2018 Nov 7;39(42):3759. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy658.
8
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
9
Direct oral anticoagulants versus standard triple therapy in atrial fibrillation and PCI: meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与房颤和 PCI 中的标准三联疗法:荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2018 Jul 3;5(2):e000785. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000785. eCollection 2018.
10
Efficacy and safety of triple therapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting: A meta-analysis.三联抗栓治疗与双联抗血小板治疗在房颤患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的疗效与安全性的Meta 分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 19;13(6):e0199232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199232. eCollection 2018.