Center for Disc Replacement at Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd. #200, Plano, TX, 75093, USA.
Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX, USA.
Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2683-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06399-3. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
One important factor in evaluating the safety of an implant is the rate of subsequent surgery and the reasons for surgery, particularly those that are related to possible problems with the implant. The purpose of this study was to determine the overall re-operation rate (including revisions, removals, device-related, procedure-related, adjacent segment, and others) for a large consecutive series of cervical TDR patients beginning with the first case experience, using a single device at a single institution.
Surgery records were reviewed to identify cervical TDR patients and those who underwent subsequent surgery. Cervical TDR cases involving ProDisc-C were identified, beginning with the first case performed in 2003 at a multisite spine specialty centre. Only patients who were at least 2 years post-operative were included, producing a consecutive series of 535 patients. There were 115 hybrids in the series (TDR at one level and fusion at an adjacent segment). Data collected included general demographics and level(s) operated. A surgery log through 12-31-18 was reviewed to identify re-operations occurring in the TDR patients. For each re-operation, the reason, duration from index surgery, and procedure were recorded. The mean duration from the index surgery to the search of the surgery log for re-operations was 78.3 months, range 24 to 181 months.
Re-operation occurred in 30 patients (5.6%). These included: 3 TDR removals and revision to anterior discectomy and fusion (1 for migration, 1 for subsidence, and 1 for spondylosis), 1 TDR repositioning, 21 secondary surgeries for adjacent segment degeneration (5 of which were adjacent to fusion levels in hybrid procedures), 1 wound infection, 1 hematoma, and 2 received stimulators for pain control. There were no re- operations for device failure. In cases of re-operation for adjacent segment degeneration, the mean duration between the index surgery and re-operation was 47.3 months.
The re-operation rate was 5.6%. No surgeries were performed for device failure. These results support the safety of the TDR device.
评估植入物安全性的一个重要因素是后续手术的比率和手术的原因,特别是那些与植入物可能出现的问题有关的原因。本研究的目的是确定在单一机构使用单一设备对大量连续颈椎 TDR 患者的总体再次手术率(包括翻修、取出、器械相关、手术相关、相邻节段和其他),这是基于首例病例经验。
回顾手术记录以确定颈椎 TDR 患者和接受后续手术的患者。确定涉及 ProDisc-C 的颈椎 TDR 病例,从 2003 年在一家多地点脊柱专科中心进行的首例病例开始。仅纳入术后至少 2 年的患者,形成了 535 例连续病例。该系列中有 115 例杂交病例(一个节段行 TDR,一个相邻节段行融合)。收集的数据包括一般人口统计学资料和手术节段。回顾 2018 年 12 月 31 日之前的手术日志,以确定 TDR 患者的再次手术。对于每次再次手术,记录原因、距初次手术的时间和手术过程。从初次手术到搜索手术日志中再次手术的平均时间为 78.3 个月,范围为 24 至 181 个月。
30 例患者(5.6%)发生了再次手术。其中包括:3 例 TDR 取出和前路椎间盘切除融合术翻修(1 例因迁移、1 例因沉降、1 例因骨关节炎),1 例 TDR 重新定位,21 例因相邻节段退变的二次手术(其中 5 例为杂交手术中融合节段的相邻节段),1 例伤口感染,1 例血肿,2 例因疼痛控制接受刺激器治疗。没有因器械故障而进行的再次手术。对于因相邻节段退变而进行再次手术的病例,初次手术与再次手术之间的平均时间为 47.3 个月。
再次手术率为 5.6%。没有因器械故障而进行的手术。这些结果支持 TDR 器械的安全性。