• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

53 例颈椎全椎间盘置换失败病例的治疗及治疗策略的描述。

Treatment of failed cervical total disc replacements in a series of 53 cases and description of a management strategy.

机构信息

Center for Disc Replacement at Texas Back Institute, 6020 W Parker Rd #200, Plano, TX, 75093, USA.

Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX, USA.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2024 Aug;33(8):3117-3123. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08402-7. Epub 2024 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08402-7
PMID:39026079
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe modes of failure of cervical TDR, their related treatment strategies, and to describe a management strategy for the treatment of failed cervical TDR.

METHODS

This retrospective study was based on a consecutive series of 53 cervical TDR patients who underwent removal or revision surgery. Chart review was conducted to collect general descriptive data, reasons for TDR removal/revision, duration from index implantation to re-operation, and the subsequent procedure performed.

RESULTS

Among 53 patients, 36 underwent TDR removal and fusion, 16 underwent TDR removal and replacement with another TDR, and one patient's TDR was revised by repositioning. The mean duration from index surgery to removal/revision was 40.1 months (range: 3 days-222 months). In all cases, removal/revision surgery was completed without complication. The most common reason for removal was severe osteolysis, often involving C. acnes infection, and was primarily associated with one implant type. TDR removal and fusion were performed for subsidence, device migration, treatment of symptoms arising from posterior anatomy (facet joints, etc.), approach-related complications and pain. TDR replacement was feasible for hypermobility, metal allergy, implant locked in kyphosis, and oversized implant use. In one case of TDR malpositioning, the device was successfully revised into appropriate position.

CONCLUSION

After cervical TDR failure, replacing a TDR with another implant can be feasible. Reasons for revision or removal after cervical TDR surgery include biomechanical failure, implant migration, surgeon or technical error, or biological reasons. The type of failure can help the surgeon create a strategy to address these complications.

摘要

目的

描述颈椎 TDR 失败的模式、相关的治疗策略,并描述一种治疗失败的颈椎 TDR 的管理策略。

方法

本回顾性研究基于连续的 53 例颈椎 TDR 患者,这些患者均接受了移除或翻修手术。对图表进行回顾性研究,以收集一般描述性数据、TDR 移除/翻修的原因、从指数植入到再次手术的时间以及随后进行的手术。

结果

在 53 例患者中,36 例行 TDR 移除和融合,16 例行 TDR 移除并用另一个 TDR 替换,1 例患者的 TDR 通过重新定位进行修正。从初次手术到移除/翻修的平均时间为 40.1 个月(范围:3 天-222 个月)。所有病例均顺利完成移除/翻修手术,无并发症。移除/翻修的最常见原因是严重的骨溶解,常涉及 C. acnes 感染,主要与一种植入物类型有关。TDR 移除和融合用于沉降、器械迁移、治疗来自后解剖结构(关节突关节等)的症状、与入路相关的并发症和疼痛。对于过度活动、金属过敏、植入物锁定在后凸、使用过大的植入物,可进行 TDR 置换。在 1 例 TDR 错位的情况下,成功地将器械修正到适当的位置。

结论

颈椎 TDR 失败后,另一个植入物可以更换。颈椎 TDR 手术后需要进行翻修或移除的原因包括生物力学失败、植入物迁移、术者或技术失误或生物学原因。失败的类型可以帮助术者制定策略来解决这些并发症。

相似文献

1
Treatment of failed cervical total disc replacements in a series of 53 cases and description of a management strategy.53 例颈椎全椎间盘置换失败病例的治疗及治疗策略的描述。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Aug;33(8):3117-3123. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08402-7. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
Removals and Revisions of Cervical Total Disc Replacement Devices in a Consecutive Series of 1626 Patients Beginning With the First Case Experience in 2003.2003 年首例病例经验以来,对 1626 例连续系列患者进行颈椎全椎间盘置换装置的移除和修正。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Oct 1;49(19):1348-1351. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005039. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Analysis of re-operations after cervical total disc replacement in a consecutive series of 535 patients receiving the ProDisc-C device.对 535 例连续接受 ProDisc-C 装置治疗的患者进行颈椎全椎间盘置换后再次手术的分析。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2683-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06399-3. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
4
Lumbar Total Disk Replacement Device Removals and Revisions Performed During a 20-Year Experience with 2141 Patients.2141 例患者 20 年的经验中进行的腰椎全椎间盘置换装置取出和翻修。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 May 15;49(10):671-676. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004942. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
5
Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.使用动态颈椎植入物进行稳定化:颈椎间盘切除及减压术后的一种新型治疗方法。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
6
Reoperations in cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior cervical fusion: results compiled from multiple prospective food and drug administration investigational device exemption trials conducted at a single site.颈椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎融合术的再次手术比较:来自单个研究地点进行的多个前瞻性食品和药物管理局调查性器械豁免试验的汇总结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1177-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ce774.
7
Comparison of revision surgeries for one- to two-level cervical TDR and ACDF from 2002 to 2011.2002年至2011年单节段至双节段颈椎人工椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路减压融合术翻修手术的比较。
Spine J. 2014 Dec 1;14(12):2841-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.037. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
8
Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.颈椎间盘置换术临床试验中(FDA 调查设备豁免)及之外的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后再次手术的影响因素。
Spine J. 2012 May;12(5):372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
9
Failure in cervical total disc arthroplasty: single institution experience, systematic review of the literature, and proposal of the RUSH TDA failure classification system.颈椎全椎间盘置换术失败:单机构经验、文献系统综述及RUSH TDA失败分类系统的提议
Spine J. 2022 Mar;22(3):353-369. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
10
Revision surgeries following artificial disc replacement of cervical spine.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后的翻修手术。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Dec;50(6):610-618. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimization of a bearing geometry for a cervical total disc replacement.颈椎全椎间盘置换术轴承几何形状的优化。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 8;13:1469366. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1469366. eCollection 2025.
2
Reoperation Strategy for Failure of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty at Index and Adjacent Levels.初次手术节段及相邻节段颈椎间盘置换失败后的再次手术策略
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 17;14(6):2038. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062038.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Hybrid Surgery in a Consecutive Series of Patients With Long-term Follow-up.连续系列患者腰椎混合手术的临床结果及长期随访
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jan 15;50(2):110-114. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005052. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Validation of the AO Spine CROST (Clinician Reported Outcome Spine Trauma) in the clinical setting.验证 AO 脊柱 CROST(临床报告的脊柱创伤结果)在临床环境中的应用。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Apr;33(4):1607-1616. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08145-5. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
3
Prosthesis design and likelihood of achieving physiological range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty: analysis of range of motion data from 1,173 patients from 7 IDE clinical trials.
颈椎间盘置换术后假体设计与实现生理活动范围的可能性:7 项 IDE 临床试验中 1173 例患者活动范围数据的分析。
Spine J. 2024 Jun;24(6):969-978. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.01.015. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
4
Cervical Disk Arthroplasty and Range of Motion at 7 Years: Impact on Adjacent Level Degeneration.颈椎间盘置换与 7 年时的活动范围:对邻近节段退变的影响。
Clin Spine Surg. 2023 Apr 1;36(3):83-89. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001446. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
Observational, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Cervical Disk Arthroplasty With Mobi-C in the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disk Disease. Results at 10 years Follow-Up.采用Mobi-C人工颈椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘退变疾病的疗效与安全性的多中心观察性研究。10年随访结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Apr 1;48(7):452-459. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004536. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
6
Anterior bone loss: A common phenomenon which should be considered as bone remodeling process existed not only in patients underwent cervical disk replacement but also those with anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion.前路骨丢失:一种常见现象,应被视为骨重建过程,不仅存在于接受颈椎间盘置换的患者中,也存在于接受前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的患者中。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):977-985. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07504-4. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
7
Cervical Implant Allergy With Chronic Neck Pain: A Case Report.颈椎植入物过敏伴慢性颈部疼痛:一例报告
Cureus. 2022 Aug 23;14(8):e28293. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28293. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Cervical and Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Implant Design and Outcomes.颈椎和腰椎间盘置换术:当前植入物设计与结果综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 May 23;9(5):227. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9050227.
9
Cervical Total Disk Replacement: Available Implant Size Matters.颈椎全椎间盘置换术:可用植入物尺寸很重要。
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 May 1;35(4):166-169. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001314. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
10
Midterm osteolysis-induced aseptic failure of the M6-C™ cervical total disc replacement secondary to polyethylene wear debris.中期骨溶解导致 M6-C™颈椎间盘置换术后无菌性失败,原因是聚乙烯磨损颗粒。
Eur Spine J. 2022 May;31(5):1273-1282. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07094-7. Epub 2022 Jan 12.