Infancy & Sleep Centre, Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Apr 11;20(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02064-2.
Programmes offering carboard baby boxes to parents in England began in some NHS Trusts in 2016. This study aimed to examine the strengths and weaknesses of English baby-box schemes as experienced by healthcare providers and parents.
An independent mixed-methods evaluation was conducted via telephone interviews and online surveys with healthcare providers and parents in all 7/9 NHS regions of England where baby-box schemes were established 2016-2019. Participants responded to requests circulated electronically by NHS Research & Design Departments, and infant health organisations in England. The objectives were to identify how parents and healthcare providers understood and experienced baby-box schemes implemented in England to date, and to produce recommendations for organisations considering involvement in future schemes.
Baby-box schemes changed over time, and were complex to run and monitor. Both parents and practitioners were misinformed about their purpose and origins. Partnerships with a commercial box-provider reduced the investment needed to run a baby-box scheme, and offered potential benefits to staff regarding engagement with families via online education and face-to-face contact around handover of boxes, but carried unforeseen costs. Of particular concern was the box-provider's access to parent personal details being promoted by NHS staff and parents' lack of awareness; the hidden costs incurred by NHS facilities of running a box-scheme; and the costs incurred by parents in accessing their 'free' box. Sixteen recommendations are proposed for healthcare providers and organisations considering commercial - health-provider baby-box partnerships in future.
Many assumptions exist about the origins and purpose of baby-boxes; this misinformation needs correcting, especially as it relates to infant death reduction and safe infant sleep. Baby-box schemes take multiple forms from those motivated by social welfare to those motivated by commercial profit. The English experience of partnership schemes between healthcare facilities and commercial box-providers reveals some success stories, along with multiple points of ambiguity, unanticipated difficulty, and concerns for infant safety.
2016 年,英格兰的一些国民保健服务信托机构开始为父母提供纸板婴儿箱计划。本研究旨在通过对英格兰所有 7/9 个国民保健服务地区的医疗保健提供者和父母进行电话访谈和在线调查,研究英国婴儿箱计划的优缺点。
通过英格兰国民保健服务研究与设计部门和婴儿健康组织以电子方式分发的请求,对所有参与的医疗保健提供者和父母进行了独立的混合方法评估。参与者对截至目前在英格兰实施的婴儿箱计划的理解和经验做出了回应,并为正在考虑参与未来计划的组织提出了建议。
婴儿箱计划随着时间的推移而变化,运行和监测都很复杂。父母和从业者都对其目的和起源存在误解。与商业箱供应商建立合作伙伴关系减少了运行婴儿箱计划所需的投资,并为员工提供了通过在线教育与家庭互动以及在交接时面对面接触的潜在好处,但也带来了意想不到的成本。特别令人关注的是,箱供应商对 NHS 工作人员宣传的父母个人详细信息的访问以及父母对此缺乏意识;NHS 设施运行箱计划的隐性成本;以及父母获得“免费”箱的成本。针对未来考虑与商业-医疗保健提供者婴儿箱合作的医疗保健提供者和组织提出了 16 项建议。
人们对婴儿箱的起源和目的存在许多假设;这种错误信息需要纠正,特别是在与减少婴儿死亡和安全婴儿睡眠有关的方面。婴儿箱计划有多种形式,从以社会福利为动机的计划到以商业利润为动机的计划。英格兰医疗保健机构与商业箱供应商之间合作计划的经验既有一些成功案例,也有多个模糊点、意想不到的困难和对婴儿安全的担忧。