University of Florida, Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 3063 Longleaf Road, Gainesville, FL, 32608, United States.
University of Florida, Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 3063 Longleaf Road, Gainesville, FL, 32608, United States.
Biol Psychol. 2020 May;153:107885. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107885. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
Pupil diameter is dynamically modulated by a number of factors, including emotion, motor activity, and attention. Here, pupil modulation was examined as it varies with locus of control during aversive processing. Participants could control aversive exposure either by escape (terminating the event) or avoidance (blocking the event entirely), or they had no control. Highly anxious (n = 19), moderately anxious (n = 23), and less anxious (n = 23) participants saw cues that signaled whether a fast button press would terminate, prevent, or not affect subsequent presentation of an aversive picture. Pupil diameter was measured throughout the cuing interval. Pupil diameter was larger when preparing to escape or avoid compared to anticipating uncontrollable exposure. All participants, regardless of reported anxiety, showed increased pupil diameter in coping, relative to uncontrollable, contexts. Results support hypotheses that pupil diameter reflects action preparation and that differences in trait anxiety do not modulate this aspect of coping behavior in healthy subjects.
瞳孔直径受多种因素的动态调节,包括情绪、运动活动和注意力。在这里,研究了在厌恶处理过程中,随着控制源的变化,瞳孔调节的情况。参与者可以通过逃避(终止事件)或回避(完全阻止事件)来控制厌恶暴露,或者他们无法控制。高度焦虑(n=19)、中度焦虑(n=23)和低焦虑(n=23)的参与者看到了信号,表明快速按下按钮是否会终止、防止或不影响随后呈现的令人厌恶的图片。在整个提示间隔期间测量瞳孔直径。与预期不可控暴露相比,准备逃避或回避时瞳孔直径更大。无论报告的焦虑程度如何,所有参与者在应对可控和不可控情境时,瞳孔直径都有所增加。结果支持瞳孔直径反映动作准备的假设,并且特质焦虑的差异不会调节健康受试者应对行为的这一方面。