• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测对侧乳腺癌:20 个国际队列中风险计算器的外部验证。

Prediction of contralateral breast cancer: external validation of risk calculators in 20 international cohorts.

机构信息

Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(2):423-434. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05611-8. Epub 2020 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-020-05611-8
PMID:32279280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8380991/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Three tools are currently available to predict the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). We aimed to compare the performance of the Manchester formula, CBCrisk, and PredictCBC in patients with invasive breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

We analyzed data of 132,756 patients (4682 CBC) from 20 international studies with a median follow-up of 8.8 years. Prediction performance included discrimination, quantified as a time-dependent Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) at 5 and 10 years after diagnosis of primary BC, and calibration, quantified as the expected-observed (E/O) ratio at 5 and 10 years and the calibration slope.

RESULTS

The AUC at 10 years was: 0.58 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.57-0.59) for CBCrisk; 0.60 (95% CI 0.59-0.61) for the Manchester formula; 0.63 (95% CI 0.59-0.66) and 0.59 (95% CI 0.56-0.62) for PredictCBC-1A (for settings where BRCA1/2 mutation status is available) and PredictCBC-1B (for the general population), respectively. The E/O at 10 years: 0.82 (95% CI 0.51-1.32) for CBCrisk; 1.53 (95% CI 0.63-3.73) for the Manchester formula; 1.28 (95% CI 0.63-2.58) for PredictCBC-1A and 1.35 (95% CI 0.65-2.77) for PredictCBC-1B. The calibration slope was 1.26 (95% CI 1.01-1.50) for CBCrisk; 0.90 (95% CI 0.79-1.02) for PredictCBC-1A; 0.81 (95% CI 0.63-0.99) for PredictCBC-1B, and 0.39 (95% CI 0.34-0.43) for the Manchester formula.

CONCLUSIONS

Current CBC risk prediction tools provide only moderate discrimination and the Manchester formula was poorly calibrated. Better predictors and re-calibration are needed to improve CBC prediction and to identify low- and high-CBC risk patients for clinical decision-making.

摘要

背景

目前有三种工具可用于预测对侧乳腺癌(CBC)的风险。我们旨在比较曼彻斯特公式、CBCrisk 和 PredictCBC 在浸润性乳腺癌(BC)患者中的表现。

方法

我们分析了来自 20 项国际研究的 132756 名患者(4682 例 CBC)的数据,中位随访时间为 8.8 年。预测性能包括区分度,以诊断原发性 BC 后 5 年和 10 年的时间依赖性曲线下面积(AUC)来量化;校准度,以诊断原发性 BC 后 5 年和 10 年的预期-观察比(E/O)和校准斜率来量化。

结果

10 年时的 AUC 为:CBCrisk 为 0.58(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.57-0.59);曼彻斯特公式为 0.60(95%CI 0.59-0.61);PredictCBC-1A(BRCA1/2 基因突变状态可用时)为 0.63(95%CI 0.59-0.66),PredictCBC-1B(一般人群)为 0.59(95%CI 0.56-0.62)。10 年时的 E/O 为:CBCrisk 为 0.82(95%CI 0.51-1.32);曼彻斯特公式为 1.53(95%CI 0.63-3.73);PredictCBC-1A 为 1.28(95%CI 0.63-2.58),PredictCBC-1B 为 1.35(95%CI 0.65-2.77)。CBCrisk 的校准斜率为 1.26(95%CI 1.01-1.50);PredictCBC-1A 为 0.90(95%CI 0.79-1.02);PredictCBC-1B 为 0.81(95%CI 0.63-0.99);曼彻斯特公式为 0.39(95%CI 0.34-0.43)。

结论

目前的 CBC 风险预测工具仅提供中等程度的区分度,曼彻斯特公式的校准效果较差。需要更好的预测器和重新校准来提高 CBC 预测,并为临床决策确定低风险和高风险的 CBC 患者。

相似文献

1
Prediction of contralateral breast cancer: external validation of risk calculators in 20 international cohorts.预测对侧乳腺癌:20 个国际队列中风险计算器的外部验证。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(2):423-434. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05611-8. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
2
Prediction and clinical utility of a contralateral breast cancer risk model.预测和临床应用的乳腺癌风险模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 17;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1221-1.
3
PredictCBC-2.0: a contralateral breast cancer risk prediction model developed and validated in ~ 200,000 patients.PredictCBC-2.0:一个在约 20 万名患者中开发和验证的乳腺癌对侧发生风险预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Oct 21;24(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01567-3.
4
Validation of a personalized risk prediction model for contralateral breast cancer.验证用于预测对侧乳腺癌风险的个体化预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(2):415-423. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4763-5. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
5
Adjuvant radiotherapy for primary breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and risk of contralateral breast cancer with special attention to patients irradiated at younger age.BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变携带者原发性乳腺癌的辅助放疗及对侧乳腺癌风险,特别关注年轻患者的放疗情况。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Nov;154(1):171-80. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3597-7.
6
CBCRisk-Black: a personalized contralateral breast cancer risk prediction model for black women.CBCRisk-Black:一种针对黑人女性的个体化对侧乳腺癌风险预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(1):179-186. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06612-5. Epub 2022 May 13.
7
Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2-neu expression in first primary breast cancers and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer.雌激素受体、孕激素受体和 HER2-神经生长因子在首次原发性乳腺癌中的表达与对侧第二原发性乳腺癌的风险。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Oct;135(3):849-55. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2183-5. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
8
A model for individualized risk prediction of contralateral breast cancer.对侧乳腺癌个体化风险预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;161(1):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4039-x. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
Hormone receptor status of contralateral breast cancers: analysis of data from the US SEER population-based registries.对侧乳腺癌的激素受体状态:来自美国基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)人群登记处数据的分析
Breast Cancer. 2017 May;24(3):400-410. doi: 10.1007/s12282-016-0716-1. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
Race, ethnicity and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer in the United States.美国种族、民族与第二原发性对侧乳腺癌风险。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Jun 1;148(11):2748-2758. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33501. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and Efficacy of Decision Aids to Improve Decision-Making for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Systematic Review.决策辅助工具改善对侧预防性乳房切除术决策的可行性与有效性:一项系统评价
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17844-2.
2
Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Contralateral Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.外科肿瘤学会乳房疾病部位工作组关于对侧乳房切除术的声明:适应证、结果和风险。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2212-2223. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14893-x. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
3
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer in Chinese female population: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction and clinical utility of a contralateral breast cancer risk model.预测和临床应用的乳腺癌风险模型。
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 17;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1221-1.
2
A systematic review of the international prevalence of mutation in breast cancer.乳腺癌基因突变国际患病率的系统评价。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 11;11:543-561. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S206949. eCollection 2019.
3
Machine learning techniques for personalized breast cancer risk prediction: comparison with the BCRAT and BOADICEA models.机器学习技术在个体化乳腺癌风险预测中的应用:与 BCRAT 和 BOADICEA 模型的比较。
中国女性人群单侧乳腺癌的对侧预防性乳房切除术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Gland Surg. 2023 Dec 26;12(12):1668-1685. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-384. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
4
Trends in Radiation Dose to the Contralateral Breast During Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy.乳腺癌放射治疗中对健侧乳房的辐射剂量趋势。
Radiat Res. 2023 Oct 1;200(4):331-339. doi: 10.1667/RADE-23-00014.1.
5
The Contribution of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Breast Cancer Genes to Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in -Negative Women.乳腺癌基因种系致病变异对BRCA1/2阴性女性对侧乳腺癌风险的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;15(2):415. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020415.
6
EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.EBCC-13 宣言:权衡利弊,决定是否行对侧预防性乳房切除术。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Mar;181:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.036. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
CBCRisk-Black: a personalized contralateral breast cancer risk prediction model for black women.CBCRisk-Black:一种针对黑人女性的个体化对侧乳腺癌风险预测模型。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(1):179-186. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06612-5. Epub 2022 May 13.
8
The risk of contralateral breast cancer: a SEER-based analysis.基于 SEER 的分析:对侧乳腺癌风险。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Aug;125(4):601-610. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01417-7. Epub 2021 May 26.
9
Breast adipocyte size associates with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer risk after ductal carcinoma in situ.乳腺导管原位癌后,乳腺脂肪细胞大小与同侧浸润性乳腺癌风险相关。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Mar 22;7(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00232-w.
10
Clinical characteristics and the associated risk factors of the development of bilateral breast cancers: A case-control study.双侧乳腺癌发生的临床特征及相关危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov 4;60:285-292. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.064. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 20;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1158-4.
4
Impact of predictor measurement heterogeneity across settings on the performance of prediction models: A measurement error perspective.预测指标在不同环境下的变异性对预测模型性能的影响:测量误差的角度。
Stat Med. 2019 Aug 15;38(18):3444-3459. doi: 10.1002/sim.8183. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.系统评价显示,机器学习在临床预测模型中并未优于逻辑回归。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
The Influence of Adjuvant Systemic Regimens on Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk and Receptor Subtype.辅助全身治疗方案对对侧乳腺癌风险和受体亚型的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jul 1;111(7):709-718. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz010.
7
Risk factors for metachronous contralateral breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.同期对侧乳腺癌的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast. 2019 Apr;44:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
8
How variation in predictor measurement affects the discriminative ability and transportability of a prediction model.预测指标测量的变化如何影响预测模型的判别能力和可转移性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;105:136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
Mortality after contralateral breast cancer in Denmark.丹麦对侧乳腺癌的死亡率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Sep;171(2):489-499. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4846-3. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
10
Patterns of Occurrence and Outcomes of Contralateral Breast Cancer: Analysis of SEER Data.对侧乳腺癌的发生模式和结局:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据的分析
J Clin Med. 2018 May 31;7(6):133. doi: 10.3390/jcm7060133.