Ehiobuche I
Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1988;344:115-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1988.tb09009.x.
Obsessive-compulsive neurosis was found to be manifest within a relatively normal (students) population. Obsessional subjects obtained from a clinical sample were compared with those obtained from normal students population on symptom, trait, resistance and interference scales of the Modified Leyton Obsessional Inventory with no significant differences in scores found. Obsessional subjects across three different ethnic/cultural backgrounds (Greeks, Italians and Anglo-Australians) consistently rated their parents as more rejecting and overprotecting and less emotionally warm in their child-rearing practices when compared with normal control subjects. The significant differences found between the obsessionals and the normal control subjects are considered as strongly indicative of the psychopathological conditions of the obsessionals found in a normal population and a differentiating factor between the two groups. Two sub-classes of obsessive-compulsive subjects were distinguished and compared in relation to their perceived parental rearing characteristics. But no significant differences were found. Thus, the notion that compulsive checkers as opposed to compulsive cleaners emerge from two different parental rearing patterns was not sustained in this instance.
在相对正常的（学生）人群中发现了强迫性神经症。将从临床样本中获取的强迫观念患者与从正常学生群体中获取的患者，在修订版莱顿强迫观念量表的症状、特质、抵抗力和干扰量表上进行比较，发现得分无显著差异。与正常对照受试者相比，来自三种不同种族/文化背景（希腊人、意大利人和英裔澳大利亚人）的强迫观念患者一致认为他们的父母在育儿方式上更具排斥性和过度保护欲，且情感上不够温暖。强迫观念患者与正常对照受试者之间发现的显著差异被认为强烈表明了在正常人群中发现的强迫观念患者的心理病理状况，以及两组之间的一个区分因素。区分了强迫性神经症患者的两个亚类，并就他们所感知的父母养育特征进行了比较。但未发现显著差异。因此，在这种情况下，与强迫性清洁者相对的强迫性检查者源自两种不同父母养育模式的观点并未得到支持。
