J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Sep-Oct;60(5S):S15-S22. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
To determine patient and prescriber perceptions of depression screening within the community pharmacy setting and to assess the best strategies for patient engagement and care coordination.
Qualitative semistructured key informant interviews using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as a theoretical framework.
A community pharmacy in the metropolitan Piedmont region of North Carolina from February 2019 to May 2019. Prescriber and patient interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by 2 investigators. A qualitative analysis was completed, with a selection of supporting quotations for each theme.
Qualitative analysis of prescriber and patient perceptions of depression screening provided in community pharmacies, strategies for patient engagement, and coordination of care for depression screenings.
Twelve patients and 4 prescribers participated in the study. The patient perceptions were categorized into 3 key themes: (1) private and confidential screenings; (2) disparate views regarding the potential interventions that pharmacists could offer; and (3) mental health stigma concerns. The prescriber perceptions were categorized into 3 key themes: (1) support for expanded access to depression screenings provided in community pharmacies; (2) necessity of referral algorithms for transitions of care; and (3) communication of full screening results for positive and negative screens. A mutual theme was identified among patients and prescribers: the view that mental health care provided at a community pharmacy was influenced by an established relationship with a community pharmacist.
This study describes patient and provider perceptions of depression screening within the community pharmacy setting. Prescribers were supportive of community pharmacists' ability to close the gaps in access to care for patients with mental health conditions, whereas patients had mixed feelings that may have been influenced by concerns of privacy, confidentiality, and stigma. This deeper understanding of prescriber and patient perceptions of how community pharmacies could expand access to depression screening may provide a roadmap for offering these interventions in community pharmacies.
确定社区药房环境中患者和处方者对抑郁筛查的看法,并评估患者参与和护理协调的最佳策略。
使用实施研究综合框架作为理论框架的定性半结构化关键知情人访谈。
北卡罗来纳州皮埃蒙特地区大都市的一家社区药房,时间为 2019 年 2 月至 5 月。对处方者和患者的访谈进行了录音、转录,并由 2 名调查员独立进行编码。完成了定性分析,并为每个主题选择了一些支持性引语。
共有 12 名患者和 4 名处方者参与了研究。患者的看法分为 3 个关键主题:(1)隐私和保密筛查;(2)对药剂师可能提供的潜在干预措施的不同看法;(3)对心理健康耻辱感的担忧。处方者的看法分为 3 个关键主题:(1)支持在社区药房扩大抑郁症筛查服务;(2)护理过渡转诊算法的必要性;(3)对阳性和阴性筛查结果的全面筛查结果进行沟通。患者和处方者之间还确定了一个共同的主题:即认为社区药店提供的心理健康护理受到与社区药剂师建立的关系的影响。
本研究描述了社区药房环境中患者和提供者对抑郁症筛查的看法。处方者支持社区药剂师为有心理健康问题的患者提供获得护理机会的能力,而患者则有不同的看法,这可能受到隐私、保密和耻辱感的担忧的影响。对处方者和患者对社区药房如何扩大抑郁症筛查服务的看法的更深入了解,可能为在社区药房提供这些干预措施提供了路线图。