Gemeda Habtamu Kebu, Lee Jaesik
Adama Science & Technology University, School of Humanity & Social Sciences, Ethiopia.
Pusan National University, Keumjeong-Gu, Jangjeon-Dong, San 30, Busan, 609-735, South Korea.
Heliyon. 2020 Apr 6;6(4):e03699. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03699. eCollection 2020 Apr.
The present study examined relationships among leadership styles, work engagement and work outcomes designated by task performance and innovative work behavior among information and communication technology professionals in two countries: Ethiopia and South Korea. In total, 147 participants from Ethiopia and 291 from South Korea were made to fill in the self-reporting questionnaire intended to assess leadership styles, work engagement, task performance, and innovative work behavior. To test the proposed hypotheses, multiple linear regression analysis was utilized. The results showed that transformational leadership style had a significant positive relationship with employees' work engagement and innovative work behavior, while transactional leadership style had a significant positive relationship with employees' task performance. However, laissez-faire leadership style had a significant negative relationship with task performance. Work engagement had significant positive relationships with the indicators of work outcomes. Besides, work engagement partially mediated the relationship between leadership styles and work outcomes. The observed associations and mediation were consistent across the two national samples considered, indicating the soundness of the assumptions across countries. The findings provide insights into how leadership styles correspond with employees' work outcomes.
本研究考察了埃塞俄比亚和韩国这两个国家信息通信技术专业人员的领导风格、工作投入与以任务绩效和创新工作行为为指标的工作成果之间的关系。总共让来自埃塞俄比亚的147名参与者和来自韩国的291名参与者填写了旨在评估领导风格、工作投入、任务绩效和创新工作行为的自陈式问卷。为了检验所提出的假设,采用了多元线性回归分析。结果表明,变革型领导风格与员工的工作投入和创新工作行为存在显著的正相关关系,而交易型领导风格与员工的任务绩效存在显著的正相关关系。然而,放任型领导风格与任务绩效存在显著的负相关关系。工作投入与工作成果指标存在显著的正相关关系。此外,工作投入部分中介了领导风格与工作成果之间的关系。在所考虑的两个国家样本中观察到的关联和中介作用是一致的,表明这些假设在不同国家具有合理性。这些发现为领导风格如何与员工的工作成果相对应提供了见解。