Min Ji Hong, Seong Hyun Yong, Ko Sung Hwa, Jo Woo-Ri, Sohn Hyun-Ju, Ahn Young Hyun, Son Ju Hyun, Seo Ho-Yeon, Son Yeong-Ran, Mun Seong-Jun, Ko Myoung-Hwan, Shin Yong-Il
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Gyeongsangnam.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Jun;43(2):159-166. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000399.
Our study aimed to confirm the therapeutic effects of using a trunk stabilization training robot (3DBT-33) in patients with chronic stroke. A total of 38 patients with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group. The robot group (n = 19) received 30 min of trunk stability robot training in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group (n = 19) received a similar conventional physical therapy as the robot group. All participants were assessed using the following: the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC), timed up and go (TUG) test, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Korean Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE). There were statistically significant improvements in all parameters at follow-up assessment after 4 weeks of intervention (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the FMA-LE, K-MBI, and BBS between the robot and control groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in FAC (P = 0.935) and TUG (P = 0.442). Minimal detectable change was more significantly observed in the FMA-LE and BBS than in FAC, TUG, and K-MBI. The findings in the present study showed that trunk stabilization rehabilitation training using a rehabilitation robot in patients with chronic stroke was effective in improving the balance and functions in the lower extremities.
我们的研究旨在证实使用躯干稳定训练机器人(3DBT - 33)对慢性卒中患者的治疗效果。总共38例慢性卒中患者被随机分为实验组或对照组。机器人组(n = 19)除接受常规物理治疗外,还接受30分钟的躯干稳定性机器人训练,而对照组(n = 19)接受与机器人组类似的常规物理治疗。所有参与者均使用以下方法进行评估:功能性步行分类(FAC)、计时起立行走(TUG)测试、伯格平衡量表(BBS)、韩国改良巴氏指数(K - MBI)以及下肢Fugl - Meyer评估(FMA - LE)。干预4周后的随访评估中,所有参数均有统计学意义的改善(P < 0.05)。机器人组与对照组在FMA - LE、K - MBI和BBS方面存在统计学意义的差异(P < 0.05)。FAC(P = 0.935)和TUG(P = 0.442)无显著差异。与FAC、TUG和K - MBI相比,FMA - LE和BBS中最小可检测变化更为显著。本研究结果表明,在慢性卒中患者中使用康复机器人进行躯干稳定康复训练可有效改善下肢平衡和功能。