• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性卒中患者高强度机器人辅助步态训练的客观与主观方法对动态平衡和有氧能力影响的比较:一项随机对照试验

Comparison of the effects on dynamic balance and aerobic capacity between objective and subjective methods of high-intensity robot-assisted gait training in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Bae Young-Hyeon, Lee Suk Min, Ko Mansoo

机构信息

a Department of Physical Therapy , Samsung Medical Center , Seoul , Republic of Korea.

b Department of Physical Therapy , Angelo State University , San Angelo , TX , USA.

出版信息

Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 May;24(4):309-313. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1275304. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1080/10749357.2016.1275304
PMID:28102113
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) is effective for improving dynamic balance and aerobic capacity, but previous RAGT method does not set suitable training intensity. Recently, high-intensity treadmill gait training at 70% of heart rate reserve (HRR) was used for improving aerobic capacity and dynamic balance.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the effectiveness between objective and subjective methods of high-intensity RAGT for improving dynamic balance and aerobic capacity in chronic stroke.

METHODS

Subjects were randomly allocated into experimental (n = 17) and control (n = 17) groups. The experimental group underwent high-intensity RAGT at 70% of HRR, whereas the control group underwent high-intensity RAGT at an RPE of 15. Both groups received their assigned training for 30 min per session, 3 days per week for 6 weeks. All subjects also received an additional 30 min of conventional physical therapy. Before and after each of the 18 sessions, the dynamic balance and aerobic capacity of all subjects were evaluated by a blinded examiner.

RESULTS

After training, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up and Go Test scores, VOmax, and VOmax/kg were significantly increased in both groups (p < 0.05). These variables in experimental group were significantly greater than control group. However, the BBS score was not significantly different between both groups. All subjects completed high-intensity RAGT. No adverse effect of training was observed in both groups.

CONCLUSION

High-intensity RAGT at 70% of HRR significantly improved dynamic balance and aerobic capacity more than RAGT at RPE of 15. These results suggest that high-intensity RAGT at 70% of HRR is safe and effective for improving dynamic balance and aerobic capacity in chronic stroke.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助步态训练(RAGT)对改善动态平衡和有氧运动能力有效,但以往的RAGT方法未设定合适的训练强度。最近,采用心率储备(HRR)70%的高强度跑步机步态训练来改善有氧运动能力和动态平衡。

目的

本研究旨在比较高强度RAGT的客观和主观方法对改善慢性卒中患者动态平衡和有氧运动能力的效果。

方法

将受试者随机分为实验组(n = 17)和对照组(n = 17)。实验组进行HRR 70%的高强度RAGT,而对照组进行主观用力程度(RPE)为15的高强度RAGT。两组均接受指定训练,每次训练30分钟,每周3天,共6周。所有受试者还额外接受30分钟的传统物理治疗。在18次训练的每次前后,由一位不知情的检查者评估所有受试者的动态平衡和有氧运动能力。

结果

训练后,两组的伯格平衡量表(BBS)、计时起立行走测试得分、最大摄氧量(VOmax)和每千克体重最大摄氧量(VOmax/kg)均显著提高(p < 0.05)。实验组的这些变量显著高于对照组。然而,两组之间的BBS得分无显著差异。所有受试者均完成了高强度RAGT。两组均未观察到训练的不良反应。

结论

HRR 70%的高强度RAGT比RPE为15的RAGT更能显著改善动态平衡和有氧运动能力。这些结果表明,HRR 70%的高强度RAGT对改善慢性卒中患者的动态平衡和有氧运动能力是安全有效的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effects on dynamic balance and aerobic capacity between objective and subjective methods of high-intensity robot-assisted gait training in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.慢性卒中患者高强度机器人辅助步态训练的客观与主观方法对动态平衡和有氧能力影响的比较:一项随机对照试验
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 May;24(4):309-313. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1275304. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
2
Effects of robot-assisted gait training on spatiotemporal gait parameters and balance in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot trial.机器人辅助步态训练对慢性卒中患者时空步态参数及平衡的影响:一项随机对照试验。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Apr 6;38(4):343-9. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161325.
3
Robot-assisted gait training improves brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and peak aerobic capacity in subacute stroke patients with totally dependent ambulation: Randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助步态训练可改善完全依赖步行的亚急性中风患者的肱踝脉搏波速度和最大有氧能力:随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5078. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005078.
4
Robot-assisted gait training for balance and lower extremity function in patients with infratentorial stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助步态训练对幕下卒中患者平衡和下肢功能的影响:一项单盲随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Jul 29;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0553-5.
5
Does robot-assisted gait rehabilitation improve balance in stroke patients? A systematic review.机器人辅助步态康复能否改善脑卒中患者的平衡?系统评价。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):87-100. doi: 10.1310/tsr2102-87.
6
Effects of high-intensity interval robot-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary function and walking ability in chronic stroke survivors: A multicenter single-blind randomized controlled trial.高强度间歇机器人辅助步态训练对慢性脑卒中幸存者心肺功能和步行能力的影响:一项多中心单盲随机对照试验。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(5):1309-1319. doi: 10.3233/BMR-230385.
7
The effects of treadmill walking combined with obstacle-crossing on walking ability in ambulatory patients after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.跑步机行走结合跨越障碍物对脑卒中后非卧床患者步行能力的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Dec;23(6):406-412. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1168592. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
Effects of robot-assisted gait training using the Welwalk on gait independence for individuals with hemiparetic stroke: an assessor-blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trial.使用 Welwalk 进行机器人辅助步态训练对偏瘫脑卒中患者步态独立性的影响:一项评估者设盲、多中心随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 May 14;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01370-5.
9
Hydrotherapy vs. conventional land-based exercise for improving walking and balance after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.水疗与传统陆地运动对改善中风后步行及平衡功能的效果比较:一项随机对照试验
Clin Rehabil. 2016 Jun;30(6):587-93. doi: 10.1177/0269215515593392. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
10
Six-Week Nordic Treadmill Training Compared with Treadmill Training on Balance, Gait, and Activities of Daily Living for Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.六周北欧式跑步机训练与跑步机训练对中风患者平衡、步态和日常生活活动能力影响的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Apr;25(4):848-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.11.037. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of the Kickstart exoskeleton lower extremity walking system on improving lower extremity walking ability in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.Kickstart外骨骼下肢行走系统对改善亚急性脑卒中患者下肢行走能力的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jul 9;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01676-y.
2
Better Understanding Rehabilitation of Motor Symptoms: Insights from the Use of Wearables.更好地理解运动症状的康复:可穿戴设备应用带来的见解
Pragmat Obs Res. 2025 Mar 19;16:67-93. doi: 10.2147/POR.S396198. eCollection 2025.
3
A Comprehensive Review: Robot-Assisted Treatments for Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients.
全面综述:中风患者步态康复的机器人辅助治疗
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 10;60(4):620. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040620.
4
Control strategies used in lower limb exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation after brain injury: a systematic review and analysis of clinical effectiveness.下肢外骨骼在脑损伤后步态康复中的控制策略:系统评价和临床效果分析。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Feb 19;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01144-5.
5
Settings matter: a scoping review on parameters in robot-assisted gait therapy identifies the importance of reporting standards.环境因素很重要:一项关于机器人辅助步态治疗参数的范围综述确定了报告标准的重要性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Apr 22;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01017-3.
6
Different Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait and Independent Over-Ground Gait on Foot Plantar Pressure in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Study.机器人辅助步态与独立地面步态对不完全性脊髓损伤患者足底压力的不同影响:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;18(22):12072. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212072.
7
Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots-A Systematic Literature Review.使用固定式步态机器人期间不良事件的发生情况及类型——一项系统文献综述
Front Robot AI. 2020 Nov 16;7:557606. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.557606. eCollection 2020.