Suppr超能文献

回避/限制型食物摄入障碍:当前文献的系统范围综述。

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: A systematic scoping review of the current literature.

机构信息

Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112961. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112961. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

Abstract

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) was recently introduced to psychiatric nosology to describe a group of patients who have avoidant or restrictive eating behaviours that are not motivated by a body image disturbance or a desire to be thinner. This scoping review aimed to systematically assess the extent and nature of the ARFID literature, to identify gaps in current understanding, and to make recommendations for further study. Following an extensive database search, 291 unique references were identified. When matched against pre-determined eligibility criteria, 78 full-text publications from 14 countries were found to report primary, empirical data relating to ARFID. This literature was synthesised and categorised into five subject areas according to the central area of focus: diagnosis and assessment, clinical characteristics, treatment interventions, clinical outcomes, and prevalence. The current evidence base supports ARFID as a distinct clinical entity, but there is a limited understanding in all areas. Several possible avenues for further study are indicated, with an emphasis placed on first parsing this disorder's heterogeneous presentation. A better understanding of the varied mechanisms which drive food avoidance and/or restriction will inform the development of targeted treatment interventions, refine screening tools and impact clinical outcomes.

摘要

回避/限制型食物摄入障碍(ARFID)最近被引入精神疾病学分类,以描述一组患者,他们的回避或限制进食行为不是由身体形象障碍或想要变瘦的愿望驱动的。本范围综述旨在系统评估 ARFID 文献的程度和性质,确定当前理解中的差距,并为进一步研究提出建议。经过广泛的数据库搜索,确定了 291 个独特的参考文献。当与预先确定的资格标准匹配时,发现来自 14 个国家的 78 篇全文出版物报告了与 ARFID 相关的主要、实证数据。根据关注的核心领域,对这些文献进行了综合和分类:诊断和评估、临床特征、治疗干预、临床结果和患病率。当前的证据基础支持 ARFID 作为一种独特的临床实体,但在所有领域的理解都很有限。进一步研究的几个可能途径被指出,重点是首先解析这种障碍的异质表现。更好地了解驱动食物回避和/或限制的各种机制将为有针对性的治疗干预措施提供信息,改进筛查工具并影响临床结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验