• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中束支传导阻滞的预后影响

Prognostic impact of bundle branch blocks in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Ozkalayci Flora, Turkyilmaz Erdem, Altıntaş Bernas, Akbal Ozgur Yasar, Karagoz Ali, Karabay Can Yucel, Tanboga İbrahim Halil, Oduncu Vecih

机构信息

Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Medical Faculty, Istinye University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol. 2021 Aug;76(6):581-586. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1747179. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1080/00015385.2020.1747179
PMID:32284031
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study we aim to determine and compare short term outcomes of all type bundle branch blocks (BBB) according to their onset time among those patients presented with ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

METHOD

Three thousand fifty-seven ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients who underwent pPCI were retrospectively evaluated. Those patients with BBB in their ECG on admission were re-evaluated for their prior ECG records. A composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI) and stroke in one moth follow up were defined as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

RESULTS

Three thousand fifty-seven STEMI patients underwent pPCI were enrolled to the study. Among these patients 134 (4.4%) had LBBB, and 120 (3.9%) had RBBB. Bundle brunch block was classified according to the timing of their onset as follows; New or Presumably New BBB, Old BBB, Indeterminate Onset BBB. At one month, 4.8% of the patients died, 2.6% had re-MI/stent thrombosis, 0.5% had stroke. MACE occurred in 7.6% of patients. Left ventricle ejection fraction, BBB, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), shock and age were ranked as the strongest predictors of MACE. Compared to non-BBB, all BBBs except for old RBBB was found to be associated with increased MACE. New onset LBBB was the strongest predictor (OR:13.1, 95%CI:3.98-43.4,  < .001) at one month MACE.

CONCLUSION

Compared to non-BBB, all BBBs except for old RBBB was found to be associated with increased MACE. New onset LBBB was the strongest predictor for MACE at one month.

摘要

背景

在本研究中,我们旨在确定并比较所有类型束支传导阻滞(BBB)在出现ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)并接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)的患者中,根据其发作时间的短期结局。

方法

对3057例行pPCI的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行回顾性评估。入院时心电图有BBB的患者重新评估其既往心电图记录。将1个月随访时的死亡、再发心肌梗死(re-MI)和中风的复合事件定义为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。

结果

3057例STEMI患者行pPCI纳入研究。这些患者中134例(4.4%)有左束支传导阻滞(LBBB),120例(3.9%)有右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)。束支传导阻滞根据其发作时间分类如下:新发或可能新发BBB、陈旧性BBB、发作时间不确定的BBB。1个月时,4.8%的患者死亡,2.6%有再发心肌梗死/支架血栓形成,0.5%有中风。7.6%的患者发生MACE。左心室射血分数、BBB、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、休克和年龄被列为MACE的最强预测因素。与无BBB相比,除陈旧性RBBB外的所有BBB均与MACE增加相关。新发LBBB是1个月时MACE的最强预测因素(OR:13.1,95%CI:3.98 - 43.4,P <.001)。

结论

与无BBB相比,除陈旧性RBBB外的所有BBB均与MACE增加相关。新发LBBB是1个月时MACE的最强预测因素。

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of bundle branch blocks in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中束支传导阻滞的预后影响
Acta Cardiol. 2021 Aug;76(6):581-586. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1747179. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
Incidence and clinical impact of right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction: ST elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者右束支传导阻滞的发生率及临床影响:ST段抬高型心肌梗死与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的比较
Am Heart J. 2008 Aug;156(2):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
3
Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?急性心肌梗死合并右束支传导阻滞患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:新发右束支传导阻滞是否应作为再灌注治疗的适应证加入未来的指南中?
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jan;33(1):86-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr291. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
4
Right bundle branch block in patients with suspected myocardial infarction.右束支传导阻滞患者疑似心肌梗死。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Mar;8(2):161-166. doi: 10.1177/2048872618809700. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
5
Impact of Quantitative ST-T Analysis in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction Presenting With Right Bundle Branch Block.怀疑心肌梗死合并右束支传导阻滞患者的定量 ST-T 分析的影响。
Am J Med. 2024 Aug;137(8):770-775.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
6
New permanent bundle-branch block and long-term prognosis of patients with new onset ST-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.新发永久性束支传导阻滞与接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的新发ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期预后
Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 22;13:892623. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.892623. eCollection 2022.
7
Differences in presentation and clinical outcomes between left or right bundle branch block and ST segment elevation in patients with acute myocardial infarction.左束支传导阻滞与急性心肌梗死患者 ST 段抬高的临床表现和临床结局差异。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Dec;9(8):848-856. doi: 10.1177/2048872620905101. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
8
Prognostic implications of bundle branch block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era.支架时代行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者束支传导阻滞的预后意义。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 May 1;105(9):1276-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.044. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
9
New or presumed new left bundle branch block in patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction.疑似 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中出现新的或疑似左束支传导阻滞。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Apr;7(3):208-217. doi: 10.1177/2048872617691508. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
orth merican OVID-19 ST-Segment-Elevation yocardial nfarction (NACMI) registry: Rationale, design, and implications.美国 OVID-19 段抬高型心肌梗死(NACMI)登记研究:原理、设计和意义。
Am Heart J. 2020 Sep;227:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 16.