Reale Giulio, Marchioni Michele, Altieri Vincenzo, Greco Francesco, De Nunzio Cosimo, Destefanis Paolo, Ricciardulli Stefano, Bergamaschi Franco, Fasolis Giuseppe, Varvello Francesco, Voce Salvatore, Palmieri Fabiano, Divan Claudio, Malossini Gianni, Oriti Rino, Tuccio Agostino, Ruggera Lorenzo, Tubaro Andrea, Delicato Giampaolo, Laganà Antonino, Dadone Claudio, De Rienzo Gaetano, Ditonno Andrea, Frattini Antonio, Pucci Luigi, Carrino Maurizio, Montefiore Franco, Germani Stefano, Miano Roberto, Schips Luigi, Rabito Salvatore, Ferrari Giovanni, Cindolo Luca
Department of Urology, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Azienda AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy -
Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct;72(5):622-628. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03597-3. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
Over the two past decades, GreenLight laser therapy has been considered a valid alternative for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia/benign prostatic obstruction (BPH/BPO). However, the debate on the effectiveness of laser therapy compared to conventional techniques is still open. The aim of our study is to analyze and describe the use of GreenLight laser prostate surgery in Italy, with regard to the surgical techniques performed and the surgical and functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up.
From March 2012 to July 2018, patients who underwent GreenLight laser prostate surgery for LUTS due to BPH/BPO from 19 Italian centers were included. The following parameters were evaluated in the population: age, prostate volume, prostate adenoma volume, PSA tot, Q
Overall, 1077 were enrolled in the study, 554 (56.4%) were treated with standard vaporization and 523 (48.6%) with anatomical vaporization. Student's t-test for paired samples showed no statistically significant differences in terms of reduction of Ht preoperative vs. Ht postoperative (42.80±3.91 vs. 39.93±5.35 95% CI P=0.3) and preintervention and postintervention Hb levels (14.28±1.46 vs. 13.72 P=0.35). Compared with the preoperative Q
To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the most numerous surgical series of GreenLight laser vaporization and with the longest follow-up. This technique should be considered as a safe and effective alternative in the treatment of secondary LUTS to BPH.
在过去二十年中,绿激光疗法被认为是治疗与良性前列腺增生/良性前列腺梗阻(BPH/BPO)相关的下尿路症状(LUTS)的一种有效替代方法。然而,与传统技术相比,激光疗法的有效性仍存在争议。我们研究的目的是分析和描述意大利绿激光前列腺手术的应用情况,包括所采用的手术技术以及中期随访的手术和功能结果。
纳入2012年3月至2018年7月期间在意大利19个中心因BPH/BPO接受绿激光前列腺手术治疗LUTS的患者。评估人群的以下参数:年龄、前列腺体积、前列腺腺瘤体积、总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、尿流率测定(UFM)时的最大尿流率(Q
总体而言,1077例患者纳入研究,554例(56.4%)接受标准汽化治疗,523例(48.6%)接受解剖汽化治疗。配对样本的Student's t检验显示,术前与术后Ht降低(42.80±3.91对39.93±5.35,95%可信区间,P = 0.3)以及干预前和干预后Hb水平(14.2�±1.46对13.72,P = 0.35)方面无统计学显著差异。与术前Q
据我们所知,这是绿激光汽化手术数量最多且随访时间最长的系列之一。该技术应被视为治疗BPH继发性LUTS的一种安全有效的替代方法。