• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索影响消费者在在线健康社区中自愿奖励免费健康服务贡献者的因素:实证研究

Exploring the Factors Influencing Consumers to Voluntarily Reward Free Health Service Contributors in Online Health Communities: Empirical Study.

作者信息

Zhou Junjie, Liu Fang, Zhou Tingting

机构信息

Shantou University Business School, Shantou, China.

China Life Property & Casualty Insurance Company Limited, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 14;22(4):e16526. doi: 10.2196/16526.

DOI:10.2196/16526
PMID:32286231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7189252/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rewarding health knowledge and health service contributors with money is one possible approach for the sustainable provision of health knowledge and health services in online health communities (OHCs); however, the reasons why consumers voluntarily reward free health knowledge and health service contributors are still underinvestigated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to address the abovementioned gap by exploring the factors influencing consumers' voluntary rewarding behaviors (VRBs) toward contributors of free health services in OHCs.

METHODS

On the basis of prior studies and the cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST), we incorporated two health service content-related variables (ie, informational support and emotional support) and two interpersonal factors (ie, social norm compliance and social interaction) and built a proposed model. We crawled a dataset from a Chinese OHC for mental health, coded it, extracted nine variables, and tested the model with a negative binomial model.

RESULTS

The data sample included 2148 health-related questions and 12,133 answers. The empirical results indicated that the effects of informational support (β=.168; P<.001), emotional support (β=.463; P<.001), social norm compliance (β=.510; P<.001), and social interaction (β=.281; P<.001) were significant. The moderating effects of social interaction on informational support (β=.032; P=.02) and emotional support (β=-.086; P<.001) were significant. The moderating effect of social interaction on social norm compliance (β=.014; P=.38) was insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Informational support, emotional support, social norm compliance, and social interaction positively influence consumers to voluntarily reward free online health service contributors. Social interaction enhances the effect of informational support but weakens the effect of emotional support. This study contributes to the literature on knowledge sharing in OHCs by exploring the factors influencing consumers' VRBs toward free online health service contributors and contributes to the CEST literature by verifying that the effects of experiential and rational systems on individual behaviors can vary while external factors change.

摘要

背景

用金钱奖励健康知识和健康服务提供者是在线健康社区(OHC)中可持续提供健康知识和健康服务的一种可能方法;然而,消费者自愿奖励免费健康知识和健康服务提供者的原因仍未得到充分研究。

目的

本研究旨在通过探索影响消费者对OHC中免费健康服务提供者的自愿奖励行为(VRB)的因素来弥补上述差距。

方法

基于先前的研究和认知-经验自我理论(CEST),我们纳入了两个与健康服务内容相关的变量(即信息支持和情感支持)和两个人际因素(即社会规范遵从和社会互动),并构建了一个提议的模型。我们从一个中国心理健康OHC中爬取了一个数据集,对其进行编码,提取了九个变量,并用负二项模型对该模型进行了测试。

结果

数据样本包括2148个与健康相关的问题和12133个答案。实证结果表明,信息支持(β = 0.168;P <.001)、情感支持(β = 0.463;P <.001)、社会规范遵从(β = 0.510;P <.001)和社会互动(β = 0.281;P <.001)的影响是显著的。社会互动对信息支持(β = 0.032;P = 0.02)和情感支持(β = -0.086;P <.001)的调节作用是显著的。社会互动对社会规范遵从的调节作用(β = 0.014;P = 0.38)不显著。

结论

信息支持、情感支持、社会规范遵从和社会互动对消费者自愿奖励免费在线健康服务提供者有积极影响。社会互动增强了信息支持的效果,但削弱了情感支持的效果。本研究通过探索影响消费者对免费在线健康服务提供者的VRB的因素,为OHC中的知识共享文献做出了贡献,并通过验证经验系统和理性系统对个体行为的影响会随着外部因素的变化而变化,为CEST文献做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2744/7189252/ed2cdd8a083c/jmir_v22i4e16526_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2744/7189252/57d8f3997ef2/jmir_v22i4e16526_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2744/7189252/46396ec45ec0/jmir_v22i4e16526_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2744/7189252/ed2cdd8a083c/jmir_v22i4e16526_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2744/7189252/57d8f3997ef2/jmir_v22i4e16526_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2744/7189252/46396ec45ec0/jmir_v22i4e16526_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2744/7189252/ed2cdd8a083c/jmir_v22i4e16526_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Factors Influencing Consumers to Voluntarily Reward Free Health Service Contributors in Online Health Communities: Empirical Study.探索影响消费者在在线健康社区中自愿奖励免费健康服务贡献者的因素:实证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 14;22(4):e16526. doi: 10.2196/16526.
2
Understanding the factors influencing health professionals' online voluntary behaviors: Evidence from YiXinLi, a Chinese online health community for mental health.理解影响健康专业人员在线志愿行为的因素:来自中国心理健康在线社区“医心一意”的证据。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Oct;130:103939. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
3
Seeking or contributing? Evidence of knowledge sharing behaviours in promoting patients' perceived value of online health communities.寻求还是贡献?知识共享行为在促进患者对在线健康社区感知价值中的作用。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1614-1626. doi: 10.1111/hex.13146. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Improving cancer survivors' e-health literacy via online health communities (OHCs): a social support perspective.通过在线健康社区提高癌症幸存者的电子健康素养:社会支持视角。
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Apr;14(2):244-252. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00833-2. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
5
Exploring the benefits and challenges of health professionals' participation in online health communities: Emergence of (dis)empowerment processes and outcomes.探索健康专业人员参与在线健康社区的益处与挑战:(去)赋权过程及结果的出现
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Feb;98:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
6
Superusers' Engagement in Asthma Online Communities: Asynchronous Web-Based Interview Study.超级用户参与哮喘在线社区:基于网络的异步访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e18185. doi: 10.2196/18185.
7
Service provision, pricing, and patient satisfaction in online health communities.在线健康社区中的服务提供、定价和患者满意度。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Feb;110:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
8
Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support.引出并接受在线支持:使用计算机辅助内容分析来审视在线社会支持的动态变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 20;17(4):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3558.
9
Assessment of Adaptive Engagement and Support Model for People With Chronic Health Conditions in Online Health Communities: Combined Content Analysis.评估在线健康社区中患有慢性健康状况人群的适应性参与和支持模型:综合内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e17338. doi: 10.2196/17338.
10
The Effect of Doctor-Consumer Interaction on Social Media on Consumers' Health Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Study.社交媒体上医患互动对消费者健康行为的影响:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 28;20(2):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9003.

引用本文的文献

1
An Analysis of Switching Behavior from Traditional Hospital Visit to E-Health Consultation.从传统医院就诊转向电子健康咨询的转换行为分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(15):1784. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151784.
2
Exploring Client Preferences for Psychological Counselors in a Chinese Online Health Community: Longitudinal Study.探索中国在线健康社区中客户对心理辅导员的偏好:纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 10;26:e58428. doi: 10.2196/58428.
3
A Research Based on Online Medical Platform: The Influence of Strong and Weak Ties Information on Patients' Consultation Behavior.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving cancer survivors' e-health literacy via online health communities (OHCs): a social support perspective.通过在线健康社区提高癌症幸存者的电子健康素养:社会支持视角。
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Apr;14(2):244-252. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00833-2. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
2
Attitudes Toward Health Care Virtual Communities of Practice: Survey Among Health Care Workers.对医疗保健实践虚拟社区的态度:医疗保健工作者调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 4;21(12):e15176. doi: 10.2196/15176.
3
Exploring the Characteristics and Preferences for Online Support Groups: Mixed Method Study.
基于在线医疗平台的研究:强弱关系信息对患者咨询行为的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 24;10(6):977. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10060977.
4
Seeking or contributing? Evidence of knowledge sharing behaviours in promoting patients' perceived value of online health communities.寻求还是贡献?知识共享行为在促进患者对在线健康社区感知价值中的作用。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1614-1626. doi: 10.1111/hex.13146. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
探索在线支持小组的特征与偏好:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 3;21(12):e15987. doi: 10.2196/15987.
4
The role of off-topic discussions in online health support groups: insights from a content analysis of an online rectal cancer group.非主题讨论在在线健康支持小组中的作用:对一个在线直肠癌小组的内容分析得出的见解。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jul;28(7):3219-3226. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05159-4. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
Associations Between Engagement With an Online Health Community and Changes in Patient Activation and Health Care Utilization: Longitudinal Web-Based Survey.参与在线健康社区与患者激活及医疗保健利用变化之间的关联:基于网络的纵向调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 29;21(8):e13477. doi: 10.2196/13477.
6
Understanding the factors influencing health professionals' online voluntary behaviors: Evidence from YiXinLi, a Chinese online health community for mental health.理解影响健康专业人员在线志愿行为的因素:来自中国心理健康在线社区“医心一意”的证据。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Oct;130:103939. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
7
The Impact of Monetary Incentives on Physician Prosocial Behavior in Online Medical Consulting Platforms: Evidence From China.货币激励对在线医疗咨询平台中医师亲社会行为的影响:来自中国的证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 26;21(7):e14685. doi: 10.2196/14685.
8
Understanding the Factors Influencing Patient E-Health Literacy in Online Health Communities (OHCs): A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective.理解影响在线健康社区(OHC)中患者电子健康素养的因素:社会认知理论视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 10;16(14):2455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142455.
9
Investigating the Effect of Paid and Free Feedback About Physicians' Telemedicine Services on Patients' and Physicians' Behaviors: Panel Data Analysis.探究关于医生远程医疗服务的付费和免费反馈对患者及医生行为的影响:面板数据分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 22;21(3):e12156. doi: 10.2196/12156.
10
Disparity between burden and budget for mental health.心理健康负担与预算之间的差距。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Feb;4(2):e75-e76. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30238-X. Epub 2018 Nov 14.