Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Cancer. 2020 Jul 1;126(13):3094-3101. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32869. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
Patients with chronic conditions are treated by many providers, which can increase the risk of communication gaps across providers and potential harm to patients. However, to the authors' knowledge, the extent of fragmented care among this population is unknown. In the current study, the authors sought to determine whether cancer survivors have more fragmented care than noncancer controls and to quantify the extent of fragmentation.
Data from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study linked to Medicare claims were used. The authors included beneficiaries with continuous Part A and B coverage for 12 months at the time of their baseline REGARDS survey. The primary outcome of the current study was claims-based fragmentation over 12 months, which was calculated using the reversed Bice-Boxerman Index so a higher score reflected greater fragmentation. Unadjusted differences in fragmentation were compared between cancer survivors and controls. Beta regression models were used to estimate associations between cancer status and fragmentation, adjusting for potential confounders.
The authors included 4922 participants aged ≥65 years at baseline. Of these patients, approximately 21% were cancer survivors. Survivors had a median of 11 visits (interquartile range, 7-15 visits) with 5 providers compared with controls, who had a median of 9 visits (interquartile range, 6-14 visits) with 4 providers (P < .0001). Cancer survivors had significantly more fragmented care compared with controls (median reversed Bice-Boxerman Index, 0.80 vs 0.76; P < .0001). After adjusting for confounders, cancer survivors had an increased odds of having fragmented care (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14).
Care fragmentation is more prevalent among cancer survivors compared with those without a history of cancer. Future studies should examine whether fragmentation puts survivors at risk of worse outcomes.
患有慢性病的患者通常会接受多位医生的治疗,这可能会增加医生之间沟通不畅的风险,从而对患者造成潜在危害。然而,据作者所知,目前尚不清楚此类人群的护理碎片化程度。在本研究中,作者试图确定癌症幸存者的护理碎片化程度是否高于非癌症对照组,并量化碎片化的程度。
本研究使用了来自“地域和种族差异导致中风的原因(REGARDS)”研究的数据,并与医疗保险索赔数据相链接。作者纳入了在基线 REGARDS 调查时连续 12 个月有 A 部分和 B 部分覆盖的受益人。本研究的主要结局是在 12 个月内基于索赔的碎片化程度,该指标使用逆 Bice-Boxerman 指数进行计算,评分越高表示碎片化程度越高。作者比较了癌症幸存者和对照组之间的碎片化差异。使用贝塔回归模型调整潜在混杂因素后,估计癌症状态与碎片化之间的关联。
作者纳入了 4922 名年龄≥65 岁的基线参与者。其中约 21%为癌症幸存者。与对照组相比,幸存者的中位数就诊次数为 11 次(四分位间距为 7-15 次),就诊次数涉及 5 位医生,而对照组中位数就诊次数为 9 次(四分位间距为 6-14 次),涉及 4 位医生(P<0.0001)。与对照组相比,癌症幸存者的护理碎片化程度明显更高(中位数逆 Bice-Boxerman 指数为 0.80 比 0.76;P<0.0001)。在调整混杂因素后,癌症幸存者有更高的可能性存在护理碎片化(比值比,1.08;95%CI,1.02-1.14)。
与没有癌症病史的患者相比,癌症幸存者的护理碎片化程度更为普遍。未来的研究应探讨碎片化是否会使幸存者面临更差的结局风险。