• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先考虑长期服务与支持(LTSS)质量:探索老年人、家庭和专业人士的观点。

Prioritizing LTSS Quality: Exploring the Views of Older Adults, Families, and Professionals.

作者信息

Davila Heather, Johnson David R, Sullivan Jennifer L

机构信息

Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Professor, Department of Organizational Leadership, Policy, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2021 May-Jun;33(3):247-267. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1750542. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1080/08959420.2020.1750542
PMID:32286922
Abstract

We conducted a cross-sectional survey involving 349 older adults, family members, and long-term services and supports (LTSS) professionals in Minnesota to assess their views on priorities for residential LTSS quality. We found considerable agreement among the three groups on the highest priorities to ensure the wellbeing of older adults who use LTSS: safety, dignity, and staffing. Relationships were also viewed as a high priority. However, older adults prioritized the physical environment over professionals, and they expressed more varied opinions on priorities overall. Older adults also consistently rated autonomy/choice as less important than other quality domains, a finding worth further exploration.

摘要

我们在明尼苏达州对349名老年人、家庭成员以及长期服务与支持(LTSS)专业人员进行了一项横断面调查,以评估他们对居家LTSS质量优先事项的看法。我们发现,这三组人群在确保使用LTSS的老年人福祉的最高优先事项上达成了相当程度的共识:安全、尊严和人员配备。人际关系也被视为高度优先事项。然而,老年人比专业人员更看重物理环境,并且他们对优先事项总体上表达了更多样化的意见。老年人还一直将自主性/选择权评为比其他质量领域更不重要,这一发现值得进一步探究。

相似文献

1
Prioritizing LTSS Quality: Exploring the Views of Older Adults, Families, and Professionals.优先考虑长期服务与支持(LTSS)质量:探索老年人、家庭和专业人士的观点。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2021 May-Jun;33(3):247-267. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1750542. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
Physical Functioning Among Older Adults New to Long-Term Services and Supports.老年人长期服务与支持新用户的身体机能。
Gerontologist. 2018 Nov 3;58(6):1147-1155. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx082.
3
Health-related quality of life: expanding a conceptual framework to include older adults who receive long-term services and supports.健康相关生活质量:将概念框架扩展至包括接受长期服务和支持的老年人。
Gerontologist. 2013 Apr;53(2):205-10. doi: 10.1093/geront/gns093. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
4
Factors Associated With Perceived Worsened Physical Health Among Older Adults Who Are Newly Enrolled Long-term Services and Supports Recipients.新纳入长期服务与支持项目的老年人中,与自我感觉身体健康恶化相关的因素
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958019900835. doi: 10.1177/0046958019900835.
5
The Role of Place in Person- and Family-Oriented Long-Term Services and Supports.地方在面向个人和家庭的长期服务和支持中的作用。
Milbank Q. 2023 Dec;101(4):1076-1138. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12664. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
6
Predictors of change over time in subjective daytime sleepiness among older adult recipients of long-term services and supports.长期接受长期服务和支持的老年接受者主观日间嗜睡随时间变化的预测因素。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Jul;32(7):849-861. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000782.
7
Re-imagining long-term services and supports: towards livable environments, service capacity, and enhanced community integration, choice, and quality of life for seniors.重新构想长期服务与支持:迈向适居环境、服务能力以及提升老年人的社区融合度、选择权和生活质量。
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):286-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv016. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
8
Older Adults' Goals and Expectations When Using Long-Term Services and Supports.老年人使用长期服务和支持时的目标和期望。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Mar;41(3):709-717. doi: 10.1177/07334648211033671. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
9
Factors Associated With Changes in Perceived Quality of Life Among Elderly Recipients of Long-Term Services and Supports.长期服务与支持老年受助者生活质量感知变化的相关因素
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jan;17(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
10
Long-term supports and services planning for the future: implications from a statewide survey of Baby Boomers and older adults.为未来进行长期支持与服务规划:来自对婴儿潮一代及老年人的全州范围调查的启示
Gerontologist. 2014 Apr;54(2):297-313. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt094. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Place in Person- and Family-Oriented Long-Term Services and Supports.地方在面向个人和家庭的长期服务和支持中的作用。
Milbank Q. 2023 Dec;101(4):1076-1138. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12664. Epub 2023 Jul 28.