Ha Kyoo-Man
Department of Public Policy & Management, Pusan National University, Republic of Korea.
Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2017 Jan;62:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
Although the number of emergency managers has risen in South Korea (hereafter referred to as Korea) over the years, their role is not yet as defined and noteworthy compared to other professions because of its unidisciplinary approach. This article investigates how Korea has to improve emergency managers' disciplinary approach to ultimately contribute to the goal of effective transnational disaster management. This study uses qualitative content analysis of government policies, college curricula, nongovernmental organizations' (NGOs') emergency-manager certification, and mass media coverage to compare emergency managers' unidisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches. The key tenet is that Korea must change its emergency managers' unidisciplinary approach into a multidisciplinary approach because the former is less effective when dealing with complicated disaster management systems. To achieve this change, the stakeholders must carry out their assigned responsibilities under risk-oriented management. As for the study's international implications, developing nations may consider the enhancement of related educational curricula, collaborative learning, continuous evaluation, disaster awareness, and disaster prevention for the emergency managers' multidisciplinary approach.
尽管多年来韩国(以下简称“韩国”)应急管理人员的数量有所增加,但由于其单一学科的方法,与其他职业相比,他们的角色尚未得到明确界定和显著关注。本文探讨韩国如何改进应急管理人员的学科方法,以最终为有效的跨国灾害管理目标做出贡献。本研究采用定性内容分析方法,对政府政策、大学课程、非政府组织(NGO)的应急管理人员认证以及大众媒体报道进行分析,以比较应急管理人员的单一学科和多学科方法。关键原则是,韩国必须将应急管理人员的单一学科方法转变为多学科方法,因为前者在应对复杂的灾害管理系统时效果较差。为实现这一转变,利益相关者必须在风险导向管理下履行各自的职责。至于该研究的国际影响,发展中国家可以考虑加强相关教育课程、合作学习、持续评估、灾害意识和灾害预防,以实现应急管理人员的多学科方法。