Merckx Joanna, Kraicer-Melamed Hannah, Gore Genevieve, Ducharme Francine M, Quach Caroline
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2019 Oct 11;4(3):145-168. doi: 10.3138/jammi.2019-0004. eCollection 2019 Oct.
In asthmatic children, respiratory pathogens are identified in 60%-80% of asthma exacerbations, contributing to a significant burden of illness. The role of pathogens in the clinical evolution of exacerbations is unknown.
We systematically reviewed the association between the presence of pathogens and clinical outcomes in children with an asthma exacerbation.
PubMed, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to October 2016 for studies reporting on respiratory pathogen exposure and clinical outcome. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool was used for quality assessment.
Twenty-eight observational studies ( = 4,224 children) reported on 112 different associations between exposure to any pathogen ( = 45), human rhinovirus (HRV; = 34), atypical bacteria ( = 21), specific virus ( = 11), or bacteria ( = 1) and outcomes of exacerbation severity ( = 26), health care use ( = 38), treatment response ( = 19), and morbidity ( = 29). Restricting the analysis only to comparisons with a low to moderate risk of bias, we observed an association between HRV and higher exacerbation severity on presentation (regression = .016) and between the presence of any pathogen and emergency department treatment failure (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57; 95% CI 1.04% to 2.37%). High-quality evidence for effect on morbidity or health care use is lacking.
Further research on the role of pathogen-treatment interaction and outcomes is required to inform the need for point-of-care, real-time testing for pathogens. Studies with a sufficiently large sample size that address selection bias, correctly adjust for confounding, and rigorously report core patient-centred outcomes are necessary to improve knowledge.
在哮喘儿童中,60%-80%的哮喘急性发作可检测到呼吸道病原体,这造成了重大疾病负担。病原体在急性发作临床演变中的作用尚不清楚。
我们系统评价了哮喘急性发作儿童中病原体的存在与临床结局之间的关联。
检索截至2016年10月的PubMed、EMBASE、BIOSIS和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,查找关于呼吸道病原体暴露与临床结局的研究。采用干预性非随机研究的偏倚风险工具进行质量评估。
28项观察性研究(n = 4224名儿童)报告了暴露于任何病原体(n = 45)、人鼻病毒(HRV;n = 34)、非典型细菌(n = 21)、特定病毒(n = 11)或细菌(n = 1)与急性发作严重程度(n = 26)、医疗保健利用(n = 38)、治疗反应(n = 19)和发病率(n = 29)结局之间的112种不同关联。仅将分析限于偏倚风险低至中度的比较时,我们观察到HRV与就诊时较高的急性发作严重程度之间存在关联(回归系数 = 0.016),以及任何病原体的存在与急诊科治疗失败之间存在关联(比值比[OR] = 1.57;95%CI 1.04%至2.37%)。缺乏关于对发病率或医疗保健利用影响的高质量证据。
需要进一步研究病原体-治疗相互作用及其结局的作用,以为即时护理、病原体实时检测的必要性提供依据。需要有足够大样本量、解决选择偏倚、正确调整混杂因素并严格报告以患者为中心的核心结局的研究,以增进认识。