Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):614-624. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
Studies examining the contribution of contralesional brain regions to motor recovery after stroke have revealed conflicting results comprising both supporting and disturbing influences. Especially the relevance of contralesional brain regions beyond primary motor cortex (M1) has rarely been studied, particularly concerning the temporal dynamics post-stroke.
We, therefore, used online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interference to longitudinally assess the role of contralesional (right) frontoparietal areas for recovery of hand motor function after left hemispheric stroke: contralesional M1, contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), and contralesional anterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS). Fourteen stroke patients and sixteen age-matched healthy subjects performed motor tasks of varying complexity with their (paretic) right hand. Motor performance was quantified using three-dimensional kinematic data. All patients were assessed twice, (i) in the first week, and (ii) after more than three months post-stroke.
While we did not observe a significant effect of TMS interference on movement kinematics following the stimulation of contralesional M1 and dPMC in the first week post-stroke, we found improvements of motor performance upon interference with contralesional IPS across motor tasks early after stroke, an effect that persisted into the later phase. By contrast, for dPMC, TMS-induced deterioration of motor performance was only evident three months post-stroke, suggesting that a supportive role of contralesional premotor cortex might evolve with reorganization.
We here highlight time-sensitive and region-specific effects of contralesional frontoparietal areas after left hemisphere stroke, which may influence on neuromodulation regimes aiming at supporting recovery of motor function post-stroke.
研究表明,对大脑对侧区域在中风后运动功能恢复中的贡献的研究结果相互矛盾,包括支持和干扰两种影响。特别是对侧大脑区域(除了初级运动皮层[M1])的相关性很少被研究,尤其是在中风后的时间动态方面。
因此,我们使用在线经颅磁刺激(TMS)干扰来纵向评估对侧(右侧)额顶叶区域在手运动功能恢复中的作用:对侧 M1、对侧背侧运动前皮层(dPMC)和对侧前顶内沟(IPS)。14 名中风患者和 16 名年龄匹配的健康受试者用他们的(患侧)右手完成不同复杂程度的运动任务。运动表现使用三维运动学数据进行量化。所有患者均在两次评估中接受评估:(i)中风后第一周,和(ii)中风后三个多月。
虽然我们没有观察到在中风后第一周刺激对侧 M1 和 dPMC 后 TMS 干扰对运动运动学的显著影响,但我们发现对侧 IPS 的干扰会在中风早期改善运动任务中的运动表现,这种效果持续到后期。相比之下,对于 dPMC,TMS 诱导的运动表现恶化仅在中风后三个月出现,这表明对侧运动前皮层的支持作用可能随着重组而演变。
我们在此强调了左侧半球中风后对侧额顶叶区域的时间敏感和区域特异性影响,这可能会影响旨在支持中风后运动功能恢复的神经调节方案。