Suppr超能文献

与标准和加速 rTMS 相关的抑郁症状轨迹。

Depressive symptom trajectories associated with standard and accelerated rTMS.

机构信息

Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare and Monash University Central Clinical School, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):850-857. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine if an accelerated rTMS protocol results in distinct depressive symptom response trajectories, compared to a standard rTMS protocol. We also sought to validate previous analyses that identified distinct depressive symptom response trajectories with rTMS treatment using an external dataset.

METHOD

Data from two recent clinical trials comparing accelerated rTMS protocol delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with standard once-daily rTMS protocol were used to identify depressive symptom response trajectories. The accelerated protocol in Trial 1 was conventional 10-Hz rTMS, while Trial 2 employed intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). Participants were adult outpatients (18-70 years old) with bipolar or unipolar depression and moderate-severe depression (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale score >19) who had failed to respond to adequate courses of two different antidepressants. We used group-based trajectory modeling to identify MADRS response trajectories, and regression techniques adjusting for baseline depressive symptom severity to determine the association between treatment protocol and depressive symptom response trajectory.

RESULTS

Treatment outcomes of 189 participants were analysed. We identified four distinct response trajectories: "nonresponse" (N = 59; 30.7%), "minimal response" (N = 65; 34.1%), "higher symptoms, response" (N = 26; 14.6%), "lower symptoms, response" (N = 39; 20.6%). We failed to find an association between rTMS protocol (accelerated vs standard) with depressive symptom response trajectory even after adjusting for baseline depressive symptom severity.

CONCLUSION

The accelerated rTMS protocol in this study did not impact depressive symptom response trajectories. This work provides further confirmatory evidence that there are distinct depressive symptom response trajectories with rTMS delivered to the left DLPFC.

AUSTRALIAN NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY

ACTRN12616000443493 and ACTRN12613000044729.

摘要

背景

为了确定与标准 rTMS 方案相比,加速 rTMS 方案是否会导致不同的抑郁症状反应轨迹。我们还试图使用外部数据集验证先前使用 rTMS 治疗确定不同抑郁症状反应轨迹的分析。

方法

使用两项比较左背外侧前额叶皮层 (DLPFC) 接受加速 rTMS 方案与标准每日一次 rTMS 方案的近期临床试验的数据来识别抑郁症状反应轨迹。试验 1 中的加速方案是传统的 10-Hz rTMS,而试验 2 则采用间歇性 theta 爆发刺激 (iTBS)。参与者为年龄在 18-70 岁之间的成人门诊患者,患有双相或单相抑郁症和中重度抑郁症(蒙哥马利抑郁评定量表评分 >19),他们对两种不同抗抑郁药的充分疗程均无反应。我们使用基于群组的轨迹建模来识别 MADRS 反应轨迹,并使用调整基线抑郁症状严重程度的回归技术来确定治疗方案与抑郁症状反应轨迹之间的关联。

结果

分析了 189 名参与者的治疗结果。我们确定了四个不同的反应轨迹:“无反应”(N=59;30.7%)、“最小反应”(N=65;34.1%)、“症状较高,反应”(N=26;14.6%)、“症状较低,反应”(N=39;20.6%)。即使在调整基线抑郁症状严重程度后,我们也未发现 rTMS 方案(加速与标准)与抑郁症状反应轨迹之间存在关联。

结论

本研究中的加速 rTMS 方案并未影响抑郁症状反应轨迹。这项工作提供了进一步的证实证据,表明左 DLPFC 接受 rTMS 治疗会产生不同的抑郁症状反应轨迹。

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册处

ACTRN12616000443493 和 ACTRN12613000044729。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验