• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用数字面罩评估视力障碍的新系统。

A New System for Assessing Visual Disability Using a Digital Visor.

作者信息

Sangiuolo Raffaele, Amore Filippo, Bacci Mauro, Brusini Paolo, Cruciani Filippo, Gualtieri Giacomo, Lancia Massimo, Sangiuolo Giulia, Sangiuolo Mario

机构信息

Italian Foundation of Digital and Robotic Ophthalmology (F.I.O.D.E.R.), 84134 Salerno, Italy.

Italian National Centre of Services and Research for the Prevention of Blindness and Rehabilitation of the Visually Impaired-WHOCC, IAPB Italy Onlus-FPG IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 11;9(4):1086. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041086.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9041086
PMID:32290446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7230512/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Considering the lack of universally accepted visual requirements for driving and for defining various grades of visual disability, the aim of this study is to propose a new method that provides a numerical score resulting from a combined assessment of the visual field and visual acuity loss obtained using a digital technology visor.

METHODS

This study presents a new system for calculating the percentage of visual disability by combining binocular visual acuity and binocular visual field assessments. A new Global Vision Evaluation System digital technology visor uses standardized, reproducible criteria to produce well-defined, numerically expressed test results. Through a specific algorithm, the device produces a numerical value expressing the percentage of visual disability.

RESULTS

Eighty-six subjects with various types of visual impairment underwent visual acuity and visual field test examinations carried out employing both traditional methods and the new digital visor. The two methods provided homogeneously similar results regarding the positioning of the subjects on the visual disability scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The new digital visor seems to be a valid method to ensure that visual disability assessments are more homogeneous and reliable, and that, consequently, the resources available for this purpose are more fairly distributed.

摘要

背景

鉴于缺乏普遍接受的驾驶视觉要求以及定义各种视力残疾等级的标准,本研究的目的是提出一种新方法,该方法通过使用数字技术面罩对视野和视力丧失进行综合评估,得出一个数值分数。

方法

本研究提出了一种通过结合双眼视力和双眼视野评估来计算视力残疾百分比的新系统。一种新的全球视力评估系统数字技术面罩使用标准化、可重复的标准来产生明确的、以数字表示的测试结果。通过特定算法,该设备产生一个表示视力残疾百分比的数值。

结果

86名患有各种视力障碍的受试者接受了使用传统方法和新数字面罩进行的视力和视野测试检查。两种方法在将受试者置于视力残疾量表上的位置方面提供了均匀相似的结果。

结论

新的数字面罩似乎是一种有效的方法,可确保视力残疾评估更加统一和可靠,从而使为此目的可用的资源得到更公平的分配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd36/7230512/9040ef75ebab/jcm-09-01086-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd36/7230512/9040ef75ebab/jcm-09-01086-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd36/7230512/9040ef75ebab/jcm-09-01086-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A New System for Assessing Visual Disability Using a Digital Visor.一种使用数字面罩评估视力障碍的新系统。
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 11;9(4):1086. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041086.
2
The effect of a hockey visor and sports goggles on visual function.曲棍球面罩和运动护目镜对视觉功能的影响。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2002 Apr;37(3):161-7. doi: 10.1016/s0008-4182(02)80058-8.
3
Superiority of clear-visor safety hat to opaque-visor hat: an evaluation of upper visual-field obstruction.透明面罩安全帽优于不透明面罩安全帽:对上视野阻碍的评估
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Dec;79(3 Pt 2):1535-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.3f.1535.
4
Visual acuity of the U.S. Navy jet pilot and the use of the helmet sun visor.美国海军喷气式飞机飞行员的视力与头盔遮阳板的使用。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1991 Aug;62(8):715-21.
5
Comparing the Impact of Refractive and Nonrefractive Vision Loss on Functioning and Disability: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation.比较屈光性和非屈光性视力丧失对功能及残疾的影响:索尔兹伯里眼科评估
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
7
Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function.青光眼患者的生活质量及其与视觉功能的关系。
J Glaucoma. 2003 Apr;12(2):139-50. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200304000-00009.
8
Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability.单眼视力与双眼视力作为视力损害的衡量指标及视力残疾的预测因素
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Oct;41(11):3327-34.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
What is low vision? A re-evaluation of definitions.什么是低视力?对定义的重新评估。
Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Apr;76(4):198-211. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199904000-00023.

引用本文的文献

1
Glaucoma and Driving License: How to Identify Patients at Risk of Revocation.青光眼与驾驶执照:如何识别有吊销执照风险的患者。
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2022 May-Aug;16(2):117-123. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1379.

本文引用的文献

1
Transnational review of visual standards for driving: How Australia compares with the rest of the world.跨国驾驶视觉标准综述:澳大利亚与世界其他地区的比较。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;47(7):847-863. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13572. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
2
Agreement of driving simulator and on-road driving performance in patients with binocular visual field loss.双眼视野缺损患者驾驶模拟器与实际道路驾驶表现的一致性
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;256(12):2429-2435. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4148-9. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
3
The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
正常眼中测试可靠性对视野敏感性的影响:新加坡华人眼研究。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
4
More than the Useful Field: Considering peripheral vision in driving.超越有用视野:考虑驾驶中的周边视野。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:316-325. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
5
Ocular disease and driving.眼部疾病与驾驶
Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Sep;99(5):395-401. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12391. Epub 2016 May 7.
6
Test Re-Test Reliability and Validity of Different Visual Acuity and Stereoacuity Charts Used in Preschool Children.用于学龄前儿童的不同视力和立体视图表的重测信度和效度
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Nov;9(11):NC01-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14407.6747. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
7
An assessment of driving fitness in patients with visual impairment to understand the elevated risk of motor vehicle accidents.对视力障碍患者的驾驶适宜性进行评估,以了解机动车事故风险升高的情况。
BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 27;5(2):e006379. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006379.
8
Validity, reliability, and repeatability of the useful field of view test in persons with normal vision and patients with glaucoma.有用视野测试在正常视力者和青光眼患者中的有效性、可靠性和可重复性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Oct 1;53(11):6763-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9718.
9
Driving simulation as a performance-based test of visual impairment in glaucoma.驾驶模拟作为青光眼视力障碍的基于表现的测试。
J Glaucoma. 2012 Apr-May;21(4):221-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182071832.
10
Reliability of Snellen charts for testing visual acuity for driving: prospective study and postal questionnaire.用于驾驶视力测试的斯内伦视力表的可靠性:前瞻性研究与邮寄问卷调查
BMJ. 2000 Oct 21;321(7267):990-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7267.990.