AgeLab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States; CSAIL, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States.
AgeLab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States.
Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:316-325. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
Applied research on driving and basic vision research have held similar views on central, fovea-based vision as the core of visual perception. In applied work, the concept of the Useful Field, as determined by the Useful Field of View (UFOV) test, divides vision between a "useful" region towards the center of the visual field, and the rest of the visual field. While compelling, this dichotomization is at odds with findings in vision science which demonstrate the capabilities of peripheral vision. In this paper, we examine driving research from this new perspective, and argue for the need for an updated understanding of how drivers acquire information about their operating environment using peripheral vision. The concept of the Useful Field and the UFOV test are not discarded; instead we discuss their strengths, limitations, and future directions. We discuss key findings from vision science on peripheral vision, and a theory that provides insights into its capabilities and limitations. This more complete basic science understanding of peripheral vision informs appropriate use of the UFOV and the Useful Field in driving research going forward.
应用研究和基础视觉研究都认为中央凹视觉是视觉感知的核心。在应用工作中,有用视野(UFOV)测试所确定的有用视野(Useful Field)概念将视野分为中心有用区域和视野其余部分。虽然这种二分法很有说服力,但它与视觉科学的发现不一致,后者展示了周边视觉的能力。在本文中,我们从这个新的角度审视驾驶研究,并主张需要更新对驾驶员如何使用周边视觉获取有关其操作环境的信息的理解。有用视野和 UFOV 测试的概念并没有被摒弃;相反,我们讨论了它们的优势、局限性和未来方向。我们讨论了视觉科学关于周边视觉的关键发现,以及一个提供有关其能力和局限性的见解的理论。对周边视觉的更全面的基础科学理解,为未来驾驶研究中 UFOV 和有用视野的合理使用提供了信息。