Grol Sietske M, Molleman Gerard R M, Wensing Michel, Kuijpers Anne, Scholte Joni K, van den Muijsenbergh Maria T C, Scherpbier Nynke D, Schers Henk J
Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, NL.
Corperate Staff Strategy Development, Radboudumc University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NL.
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Apr 1;20(1):12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4721.
Frail older people living in the community require multidisciplinary care. Despite the fact that patient participation is high on the public agenda, studies into multidisciplinary care mainly focus on the viewpoints of professionals. Little is known about frail older patients' experiences with care delivered by multidisciplinary teams and their perception of collaboration between professional and informal caregivers.
To gain more insight into the experiences of frail older patients with integrated multidisciplinary care by mapping the care networks of this patient group and their perception of the interconnection between professional and informal caregivers.
Survey study to facilitate a care network analysis. Due to the vulnerable health status of the respondents, questionnaires were completed during interviews. Analysis was performed using an iterative process, using both visual and metric techniques.
44 older persons, considered 'frail' by their general practitioner.
Four general practices in The Netherlands.
The networks of the participants consisted of an average of 15 actors connected by 54 ties. General practitioners were the most common actors in the networks, and were well connected to medical specialists and in-home care providers. The participants did not always perceive a connection between their general practitioner and their informal caregiver. The network analyses resulted in the identification of three subtypes: simple star (n = 16), complex star (n = 16), and sub-group networks (n = 12).
Our findings indicate that the elderly often do not experience the integration of multidisciplinary care as such. This is a real opportunity for MTs to improve their care and to make the patients' experiences better in line with what they are aiming: allowing patients to live at home as healthy and independently as possible for as long as possible. We showed that informal caregivers often form communication bridges between patients and professionals. Having a better knowledge of the patient perspective enables the gaps in professional care networks of frail older people to be filled and facilitates the anticipation of crisis situations.
生活在社区中的体弱老年人需要多学科护理。尽管患者参与在公共议程中占据重要位置,但多学科护理研究主要关注专业人员的观点。对于体弱老年患者在多学科团队提供护理方面的体验以及他们对专业和非正式护理人员之间协作的看法,我们知之甚少。
通过绘制该患者群体的护理网络及其对专业和非正式护理人员之间相互联系的看法,更深入地了解体弱老年患者在综合多学科护理方面的体验。
进行调查研究以促进护理网络分析。由于受访者健康状况脆弱,问卷调查在访谈期间完成。分析采用迭代过程,运用视觉和度量技术。
44名被其全科医生认定为“体弱”的老年人。
荷兰的四家全科诊所。
参与者的网络平均由15个行动者通过54条联系连接而成。全科医生是网络中最常见的行动者,与医学专家和家庭护理提供者联系紧密。参与者并不总是能察觉到他们的全科医生与非正式护理人员之间的联系。网络分析确定了三种亚型:简单星型(n = 16)、复杂星型(n = 16)和子群体网络(n = 12)。
我们的研究结果表明,老年人通常并未体验到多学科护理的整合。这是多学科团队改善护理并使患者体验更符合其目标的真正契机:让患者尽可能长时间地在家中健康且独立地生活。我们表明,非正式护理人员常常在患者与专业人员之间形成沟通桥梁。更好地了解患者视角能够填补体弱老年人专业护理网络中的空白,并有助于对危机情况进行预判。