Mathieu Dominique, Bedwani Stéphane, Mascolo-Fortin Julia, Côté Nicolas, Bernard Andrée-Anne, Roberge David, Yassa Michael, Bahig Houda, Vu Toni
Radiation Oncology, University of Montréal Health Centre, Montréal, CAN.
Radiation Oncology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montréal, CAN.
Cureus. 2020 Mar 12;12(3):e7247. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7247.
Purpose To compare cardiac doses of different whole-breast optimization schemes including free-breathing (FB) tangential radiotherapy (TRT), deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) TRT, and FB helical tomotherapy (HT). Methods Early-stage left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy were included in the study. Planning images included FB and DIBH CT scans acquired in the same supine treatment position with both arms abducted. A hypofractionated regimen of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions was used. Clinical target volume delineation was aided through the use of a radio-opaque wire. A 7-mm margin was used in generating the planning target volumes. TRT plans were generated both in FB and DIBH. For the FB tomotherapy technique, a first plan (Tomo 1) was optimized limiting the maximum contralateral breast dose to 3.1 Gy. A second tomotherapy plan (Tomo 2) focused on the reduction of the mean heart dose without controlling the contralateral breast dose. All plans were optimized to obtain an equivalent planning target volume (PTV) coverage of ≥95% of the prescribed dose while minimizing the dose to organs at risk. Results Twenty-three patients treated between October 2012 and March 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Eleven patients (48%) had at least one major cardiovascular risk factors including one patient (4%) with a history of myocardial infarction. Six patients (26%) had been exposed to cardiotoxic chemotherapy agents. The average mean dose to the heart was 3.1 Gy with FB TRT, 1.1 with DIBH TRT, 2.4 Gy for Tomo 1, and 1.5 Gy for Tomo 2. The mean dose to the left anterior descending artery was 27.0 Gy, 8.0 Gy, 13.7 Gy and 6.6 Gy for FB TRT, DIBH TRT, Tomo 1 and Tomo 2 plans respectively. Conclusion Different cardiac-sparing optimization schemes are possible when treating left breast cancer. Although DIBH offers clear mean heart dose reductions, tomotherapy can be an interesting alternative treatment modality to spare the heart and coronary vessels, notably in patients who cannot comply with DIBH.
目的 比较不同全乳优化方案的心脏剂量,这些方案包括自由呼吸(FB)切线放疗(TRT)、深吸气屏气(DIBH)TRT和FB螺旋断层放疗(HT)。方法 本研究纳入接受保乳手术并辅助放疗的早期左侧乳腺癌患者。计划图像包括在相同仰卧位治疗体位且双臂外展的情况下采集的FB和DIBH CT扫描图像。采用16次分割给予42.5 Gy的低分割方案。通过使用不透射线的金属丝辅助进行临床靶区勾画。在生成计划靶区时使用7 mm的边界。在FB和DIBH两种状态下均生成TRT计划。对于FB断层放疗技术,第一个计划(Tomo 1)进行优化,将对侧乳腺的最大剂量限制在3.1 Gy。第二个断层放疗计划(Tomo 2)专注于降低平均心脏剂量,而不控制对侧乳腺剂量。所有计划均进行优化,以获得≥95%处方剂量的等效计划靶区(PTV)覆盖,同时将危及器官的剂量降至最低。结果 本回顾性研究纳入了2012年10月至2016年3月期间治疗的23例患者。11例患者(48%)至少有一项主要心血管危险因素,其中1例患者(4%)有心肌梗死病史;6例患者(26%)曾接受心脏毒性化疗药物治疗。FB TRT时心脏的平均剂量为3.1 Gy,DIBH TRT时为1.1 Gy,Tomo 1为2.4 Gy,Tomo 2为1.5 Gy。FB TRT、DIBH TRT、Tomo 1和Tomo 2计划中,左前降支动脉的平均剂量分别为27.0 Gy、8.0 Gy、13.7 Gy和6.6 Gy。结论 治疗左侧乳腺癌时可采用不同的心脏保护优化方案。虽然DIBH可显著降低平均心脏剂量,但断层放疗可能是一种有吸引力的替代治疗方式,可保护心脏和冠状动脉,尤其是对于无法配合DIBH的患者。