• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Kardashian Index of Cardiologists: Celebrities or Experts?

作者信息

Khan Muhammad Shahzeb, Shahadat Amna, Khan Safi U, Ahmed Saba, Doukky Rami, Michos Erin D, Kalra Ankur

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, John H Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

JACC Case Rep. 2020 Feb;2(2):330-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.11.068. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.11.068
PMID:32292918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7156124/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The Kardashian Index of Cardiologists: Celebrities or Experts?心脏病专家的卡戴珊指数：名人还是专家？
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Feb;2(2):330-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.11.068. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
Physician-scientists or celebrities? Kardashian-index of gastroenterologists.内科医生科学家还是名人？胃肠病学家的卡戴珊指数。
World J Methodol. 2023 Sep 20;13(4):337-344. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.337.
3
The Kardashian index of cardiologists: Do more social media followers mean more citations or merely celebrity status in academia?心脏病专家的卡戴珊指数：社交媒体上的粉丝越多意味着被引用次数越多，还是仅仅意味着在学术界拥有名人地位？
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 2;71:102981. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102981. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Medical journals, impact and social media: an ecological study of the Twittersphere.医学期刊、影响力与社交媒体：对推特圈的一项生态学研究
CMAJ. 2015 Dec 8;187(18):1353-1357. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150976.
5
Reply: The Social Media Kardashian Index: A Stagnant Measure for an Innovative Platform.
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Jun 17;2(6):983-984. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.05.006. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
The Social Media Kardashian Index: A Stagnant Measure for an Innovative Platform.社交媒体卡戴珊指数：一个创新平台的滞后衡量标准。
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Jun 17;2(6):982-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.04.043. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Celebrities' impact on health-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and status outcomes: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.名人对健康相关知识、态度、行为及状况结果的影响：一项系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归分析的方案
Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 21;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0395-1.
8
Before the Kardashian Index.在卡戴珊指数之前。
Science. 2014 Oct 17;346(6207):308. doi: 10.1126/science.346.6207.308-a.
9
Biological, psychological and social processes that explain celebrities' influence on patients' health-related behaviors.解释名人对患者健康相关行为影响的生物、心理和社会过程。
Arch Public Health. 2015 Jan 19;73(1):3. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-73-3. eCollection 2015.
10
On the link between media coverage of anorexia and pro-anorexic practices on the web.论媒体对厌食症的报道与网络上赞成厌食症做法之间的联系。
Int J Eat Disord. 2014 Mar;47(2):196-202. doi: 10.1002/eat.22195. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician-scientists or celebrities? Kardashian-index of gastroenterologists.内科医生科学家还是名人？胃肠病学家的卡戴珊指数。
World J Methodol. 2023 Sep 20;13(4):337-344. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.337.
2
Twitter trends in #Parasitology determined by text mining and topic modelling.通过文本挖掘和主题建模确定的#寄生虫学领域的推特趋势。
Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2023 Aug 12;4:100138. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2023.100138. eCollection 2023.
3
Guidelines: The Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows of Creating Open Educational Resources.指南：创建开放教育资源的可做、不可做和未知事项。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jan 9;12(1):25-40. doi: 10.5334/pme.817. eCollection 2023.
4
Mapping and quantification of the twitter footprint of cardiologists.心脏病专家推特足迹的映射与量化
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021 Jun 2;2(3):374-378. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab049. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Researchers in cardiology - Why and how to get on Twitter?心脏病学领域的研究人员——为何以及如何使用推特？
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Mar 28;40:101010. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101010. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
The Kardashian index of cardiologists: Do more social media followers mean more citations or merely celebrity status in academia?心脏病专家的卡戴珊指数：社交媒体上的粉丝越多意味着被引用次数越多，还是仅仅意味着在学术界拥有名人地位？
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 2;71:102981. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102981. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Reply: The Social Media Kardashian Index: A Stagnant Measure for an Innovative Platform.
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Jun 17;2(6):983-984. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.05.006. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
The Social Media Kardashian Index: A Stagnant Measure for an Innovative Platform.社交媒体卡戴珊指数：一个创新平台的滞后衡量标准。
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Jun 17;2(6):982-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.04.043. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Understanding the Analytics of Twitter in Cardiovascular Medicine.了解心血管医学领域中推特的分析方法。
JACC Case Rep. 2020 May 6;2(5):837-839. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.03.008. eCollection 2020 May.
10
A Perspective on the K-Index.
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Feb 5;2(2):335-336. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.01.003. eCollection 2020 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
View point on social media use in interventional cardiology.关于社交媒体在介入心脏病学中的应用观点
Open Heart. 2019 May 22;6(1):e001031. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001031. eCollection 2019.
2
Understanding Social Media: Opportunities for Cardiovascular Medicine.理解社交媒体：心血管医学的机遇。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 12;73(9):1089-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.044.
3
Correlation of Altmetric Attention Score With Article Citations in Cardiovascular Research.阿尔特米特关注度得分与心血管研究中文章引用次数的相关性
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 21;72(8):952-953. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.062.
4
Academic information on Twitter: A user survey.推特上的学术信息：用户调查。
PLoS One. 2018 May 17;13(5):e0197265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197265. eCollection 2018.
5
Why cardiologists should be on social media - the value of online engagement.心脏病专家为何应活跃于社交媒体——在线互动的价值
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Dec;15(12):889-890. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1408408. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
6
Twitter as a Potential Data Source for Cardiovascular Disease Research.推特作为心血管疾病研究的潜在数据源。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Dec 1;1(9):1032-1036. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3029.
7
The Use of Twitter by Radiology Journals: An Analysis of Twitter Activity and Impact Factor.放射学期刊对推特的使用：推特活跃度与影响因子分析
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Nov;13(11):1391-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.06.041. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
8
A randomized trial of social media from Circulation.随机试验来自 Circulation 的社交媒体。
Circulation. 2015 Jan 6;131(1):28-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013509. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
9
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists.卡戴珊指数：衡量科学家社交媒体形象差异的一种指标。
Genome Biol. 2014 Jul 30;15(7):424. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0424-0.
10
Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact.推文能否预测引用量？基于推特的社会影响力指标及其与传统科学影响力指标的相关性。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 19;13(4):e123. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2012.