Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, CA.
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jan 9;12(1):25-40. doi: 10.5334/pme.817. eCollection 2023.
In medical education, there is a growing global demand for Open Educational Resources (OERs). However, OER creators are challenged by a lack of uniform standards. In this guideline, the authors curated the literature on how to produce OERs for medical education with practical guidance on the Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows for OER creation in order to improve the impact and quality of OERs in medical education.
We conducted a rapid literature review by searching OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central database using keywords "open educational resources" and "OER". The search was supplemented by hand searching the identified articles' references. We organized included articles by theme and extracted relevant content. Lastly, we developed recommendations via an iterative process of peer review and discussion: evidence-based best practices were designated Do's and Don'ts while gaps were designated Don't Knows. We used a consensus process to quantify evidentiary strength.
The authors performed full text analysis of 81 eligible studies. A total of 15 Do's, Don't, and Don't Knows guidelines were compiled and presented alongside relevant evidence about OERs.
OERs can add value for medical educators and their learners, both as tools for expanding teaching opportunities and for promoting medical education scholarship. This summary should guide OER creators in producing high-quality resources and pursuing future research where best practices are lacking.
在医学教育中,全球对开放教育资源(OER)的需求日益增长。然而,OER 创作者面临缺乏统一标准的挑战。在本指南中,作者整理了有关如何为医学教育制作 OER 的文献,提供了 OER 创作的实用指导,包括注意事项、禁忌和未知领域,以提高 OER 在医学教育中的影响力和质量。
我们使用关键词“开放教育资源”和“OER”在 OVID MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central 数据库中进行了快速文献检索。通过对已确定文章的参考文献进行手工搜索来补充搜索。我们按主题组织收录的文章,并提取相关内容。最后,我们通过同行评审和讨论的迭代过程制定了建议:基于证据的最佳实践被指定为注意事项和禁忌,而空白则被指定为未知领域。我们使用共识过程来量化证据的强度。
作者对 81 篇合格研究进行了全文分析。共编制了 15 项注意事项、禁忌和未知领域指南,并附有关于 OER 的相关证据。
OER 可以为医学教育者及其学习者增加价值,既是扩大教学机会的工具,也是促进医学教育学术研究的工具。本摘要应指导 OER 创作者制作高质量的资源,并在最佳实践缺乏的情况下开展未来研究。