Laboratory of Toxycology and Advanced Diagnostics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense, Modena, Italy.
Department of Neuroscience, Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 May;50(5):e13228. doi: 10.1111/eci.13228. Epub 2020 May 19.
More than 30 causative genes have been identified in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful and groundbreaking tool to identify disease-associated variants. Despite documented advantages of NGS, its diagnostic reliability needs to be addressed in order to use this technology for specific routine diagnosis.
Literature database was explored to identify studies comparing NGS and Sanger sequencing for the detection of variants causing ALS. We collected data about patients' characteristics, disease type and duration, NGS and Sanger properties.
More than 200 bibliographic references were identified, of which only 14 studies matching our inclusion criteria. Only 2 out of 14 studies compared results of NGS analysis with the Sanger sequencing. Twelve studies screened causative genes associated to ALS using NGS technologies and confirmed the identified variants with Sanger sequencing. Overall, data about more 2,000 patients were analysed. The number of genes that were investigated in each study ranged from 1 to 32, the most frequent being FUS, OPTN, SETX and VCP. NGS identified already known mutations in 21 genes, and new or rare variants in 27 genes.
NGS seems to be a promising tool for the diagnosis of ALS in routine clinical practice. Its advantages are represented by an increased speed and a lowest sequencing cost, but patients' counselling could be problematic due to the discovery of frequent variants of unknown significance.
家族性和散发性肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)已确定超过 30 个致病基因。下一代测序(NGS)是一种强大且开创性的工具,可识别与疾病相关的变异。尽管 NGS 具有已记录的优势,但为了将该技术用于特定的常规诊断,仍需要解决其诊断可靠性问题。
我们查阅了文献数据库,以确定比较 NGS 和 Sanger 测序检测导致 ALS 变异的研究。我们收集了有关患者特征、疾病类型和持续时间、NGS 和 Sanger 特性的数据。
共确定了 200 多个文献参考,其中只有 14 项研究符合我们的纳入标准。只有 2 项研究将 NGS 分析结果与 Sanger 测序进行了比较。12 项研究使用 NGS 技术筛选与 ALS 相关的致病基因,并使用 Sanger 测序对鉴定出的变异进行了确认。总体上,分析了超过 2000 名患者的数据。每项研究调查的基因数量从 1 个到 32 个不等,最常见的是 FUS、OPTN、SETX 和 VCP。NGS 在 21 个基因中鉴定出了已知的突变,在 27 个基因中鉴定出了新的或罕见的变异。
NGS 似乎是常规临床实践中诊断 ALS 的有前途的工具。其优势在于速度加快和测序成本最低,但由于发现了频繁的未知意义的变异,患者咨询可能会出现问题。