• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国科技社团应如何促进科研诚信建设。

How Chinese scientific societies should promote the construction of research integrity.

机构信息

School of Marxism Studies, Dalian University of Technology , Dalian, CN, China.

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dalian University of Technology , Dalian, CN, China.

出版信息

Account Res. 2020 Jul;27(5):271-283. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1756265. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1080/08989621.2020.1756265
PMID:32293199
Abstract

Scientific societies play an important role in promoting and fostering research integrity. Through a comparative study between China and the United States based on information published over the internet, this article lays out some problems existing in Chinese scientific societies concerning the promotion of research integrity. Research integrity assumes only a minor presence in societies' policy texts, terms that are incorporated tend to be too general, and concrete action often remains superficial. To remedy these problems, this article makes five recommendations for scientific societies to put more emphasis on research integrity: (1) formulating more professional and specific norms; (2) launching dedicated columns or adding related articles in journals; (3) holding seminars and briefings; (4) setting up specialized committees; and (5) strengthening research integrity education. To supplement the realization of these goals, the article also suggests possible incentive measures.

摘要

科学学会在促进和培养研究诚信方面发挥着重要作用。本文通过对中美两国互联网上发布的信息进行比较研究,阐述了中国科学学会在促进研究诚信方面存在的一些问题。诚信研究在学会的政策文本中只占很小的比重,所采用的术语往往过于笼统,具体行动也往往流于表面。为了解决这些问题,本文为科学学会提出了五点加强研究诚信的建议:(1)制定更专业、更具体的规范;(2)在期刊上开辟专门栏目或增加相关文章;(3)举办研讨会和情况通报会;(4)设立专门委员会;(5)加强研究诚信教育。为了补充实现这些目标,本文还提出了一些可能的激励措施。

相似文献

1
How Chinese scientific societies should promote the construction of research integrity.中国科技社团应如何促进科研诚信建设。
Account Res. 2020 Jul;27(5):271-283. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1756265. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
The role of scientific associations in promoting research integrity and deterring research misconduct. Commentary on 'Challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity' (Levine and Iutcovitch).科学协会在促进研究诚信和遏制研究不当行为方面的作用。对《研究科学团体对研究诚信影响的挑战》(莱文和尤特科维奇)的评论。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):269-72. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0013-1.
3
Scientific societies and research integrity: what are they doing and how well are they doing it?科学协会与研究诚信:它们在做什么,做得如何?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):141-58. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0002-4.
4
Roles for scientific societies in promoting integrity in publication ethics.科学协会在促进出版伦理诚信方面的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):221-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0010-4.
5
Challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity.研究科学团体对研究诚信影响所面临的挑战。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):257-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0012-2.
6
Development of international guidelines for research ethics: a commentary on "Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin).国际研究伦理准则的制定:对《科学不端行为:当前问题与未来趋势》(B. 米什金)的评论
Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):293-8. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0021-x.
7
Promoting research integrity at the American Society for Microbiology.在美国微生物学会促进研究诚信。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Apr;9(2):215-20. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0009-x.
8
Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct.致力于对研究不端行为指控进行公平调查的全球标准化。
Account Res. 2020 Aug;27(6):327-346. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1747019. Epub 2020 May 12.
9
How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.中国高校如何应对研究诚信和不当行为?对高校文件的审查。
Dev World Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(2):64-75. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12231. Epub 2019 May 15.
10
Anthropologists split over misconduct claims.人类学家因不当行为指控产生分歧。
Nature. 2002 Jan 3;415(6867):5. doi: 10.1038/415005a.

引用本文的文献

1
Current situation and influence factors of scientific integrity in China: A multicenter survey.中国科研诚信的现状及影响因素:一项多中心调查
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Dec 22;11(2):100365. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100365. eCollection 2024 Feb.