• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬治疗儿童喘息和哮喘加重的风险:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Risk of wheezing and asthma exacerbation in children treated with paracetamol versus ibuprofen: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1102-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12890-020-1102-5
PMID:32293369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7087361/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the most commonly used medications for fever and pain management in children. While the efficacy appears similar with both drugs, there are contradictory findings related to adverse events. In particular, incidence of wheezing and asthma among children taking paracetamol compared to ibuprofen, remain unsettled.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared wheezing and asthma exacerbations in children taking paracetamol versus ibuprofen. A comprehensive search was conducted in five databases. RCTs reporting on cases of wheezing or asthma exacerbations in infants or children after the administration of paracetamol or ibuprofen were included. The pooled effect size was estimated using the Peto's odds ratio.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with 85,095 children were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate (OR 1.05; 95%CI 0.76-1.46) revealed no difference in the odds of developing asthma or presenting an exacerbation of asthma in children who received paracetamol compared to ibuprofen. When the analysis was restricted to RCTs that examined the incidence of asthma exacerbation or wheezing, the pooled estimate remained similar (OR 1.01; 95%CI 0.63-1.64). Additional bias adjusted quality effect sensitivity model yielded similar results (RR 1.03; 95%CI 0.84-1.28).

CONCLUSION

Although, Ibuprofen and paracetamol appear to have similar tolerance and safety profiles in terms of incidence of asthma exacerbations in children, we suggest high quality trials with clear definition of asthma outcomes after receiving ibuprofen or paracetamol at varying doses with longer follow-up are warranted for any conclusive finding.

摘要

背景

对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬是儿童发热和疼痛管理中最常用的药物。虽然这两种药物的疗效似乎相似,但与不良反应相关的研究结果却相互矛盾。特别是,与布洛芬相比,服用对乙酰氨基酚的儿童出现喘息和哮喘的发生率仍未确定。

方法

我们对比较儿童服用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬后喘息和哮喘恶化的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析。我们在五个数据库中进行了全面检索。纳入报告在使用对乙酰氨基酚或布洛芬后婴儿或儿童出现喘息或哮喘恶化病例的 RCT。使用 Peto 的优势比估计汇总效应大小。

结果

纳入了五项包含 85095 名儿童的 RCT 进行分析。汇总估计值(OR 1.05;95%CI 0.76-1.46)显示,接受对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬的儿童发生哮喘或哮喘恶化的几率没有差异。当分析仅限于检查哮喘恶化或喘息发生率的 RCT 时,汇总估计值仍相似(OR 1.01;95%CI 0.63-1.64)。额外的偏倚调整质量效果敏感性模型得出了相似的结果(RR 1.03;95%CI 0.84-1.28)。

结论

虽然布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚在儿童哮喘恶化的发生率方面似乎具有相似的耐受性和安全性,但我们建议进行高质量的试验,用不同剂量的布洛芬或对乙酰氨基酚治疗后,明确哮喘结局的定义,并进行更长时间的随访,以得出任何结论性的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/7087361/b7abcb9a1c39/12890_2020_1102_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/7087361/928a176501ed/12890_2020_1102_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/7087361/7d64df1a6563/12890_2020_1102_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/7087361/b7abcb9a1c39/12890_2020_1102_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/7087361/928a176501ed/12890_2020_1102_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/7087361/7d64df1a6563/12890_2020_1102_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/7087361/b7abcb9a1c39/12890_2020_1102_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of wheezing and asthma exacerbation in children treated with paracetamol versus ibuprofen: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬治疗儿童喘息和哮喘加重的风险:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1102-5.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical safety and tolerability of ibuprofen compared with paracetamol in paediatric pain and fever.布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚治疗儿童疼痛和发热的临床安全性及耐受性的系统评价和荟萃分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Sep;25(9):2207-22. doi: 10.1185/03007990903116255.
3
Association of Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen Use With Wheezing in Children With Acute Febrile Illness.对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬的使用与急性发热疾病患儿喘息的关联
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Mar;51(3):239-244. doi: 10.1177/1060028016678006. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
4
A review of ibuprofen and acetaminophen use in febrile children and the occurrence of asthma-related symptoms.布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚在发热儿童中的使用情况及哮喘相关症状的发生情况综述。
Clin Ther. 2007 Dec;29(12):2716-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.021.
5
Ibuprofen and/or paracetamol (acetaminophen) for pain relief after surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth.布洛芬和/或对乙酰氨基酚用于拔除下颌智齿后的止痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD004624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004624.pub2.
6
Comparison of Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) With Ibuprofen for Treatment of Fever or Pain in Children Younger Than 2 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)与布洛芬治疗2岁以下儿童发热或疼痛的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2022398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22398.
7
Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.对发热儿童采用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬联合及交替治疗。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):675-729. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1978.
8
Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in children and adults: a meta-analysis and qualitative review.布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚在儿童和成人中的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析和定性评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Mar;44(3):489-506. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M332. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
9
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm or low-birth-weight infants.对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)用于早产儿或低体重儿动脉导管未闭的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11(3):CD010061. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010061.pub2.
10
Wheezing after the use of acetaminophen and or ibuprofen for first episode of bronchiolitis or respiratory tract infection.在首次出现细支气管炎或呼吸道感染时使用对乙酰氨基酚和/或布洛芬后出现喘息。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203770. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Morbidity and Drug Prescribing Pattern in Pediatric Outpatient Department of Kankai Nagar Hospital of Eastern Nepal.尼泊尔东部坎凯纳加尔医院儿科门诊的发病率及药物处方模式
Sage Open Pediatr. 2025 Mar 16;12:30502225251319878. doi: 10.1177/30502225251319878. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
The association between ibuprofen administration in children and the risk of developing or exacerbating asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.布洛芬在儿童中的应用与哮喘发生或恶化风险之间的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Aug 26;24(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03179-3.
3
The burden of asthma among children and adolescents in Saudi Arabia: A national cross-sectional survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Wheezing after the use of acetaminophen and or ibuprofen for first episode of bronchiolitis or respiratory tract infection.在首次出现细支气管炎或呼吸道感染时使用对乙酰氨基酚和/或布洛芬后出现喘息。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203770. eCollection 2018.
2
A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.一种新的改进的图形和定量方法,用于检测荟萃分析中的偏倚。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018 Dec;16(4):195-203. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000141.
3
Alternating Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen versus Monotherapies in Improvements of Distress and Reducing Refractory Fever in Febrile Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
沙特阿拉伯儿童和青少年哮喘负担:一项全国性横断面调查。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2022 Sep 7;1(4):241-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2022.07.006. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alone or combined, for pain relief in acute otitis media in children.对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)或非甾体抗炎药,单独或联合使用,用于缓解儿童急性中耳炎的疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 18;8(8):CD011534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011534.pub3.
5
The Effective Management of Fever in Pediatrics and Insights on Remote Management: Experts' Consensus Using a Delphi Approach.儿科发热的有效管理及远程管理见解:采用德尔菲法的专家共识
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 26;10:834673. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.834673. eCollection 2022.
6
EA3: A softmax algorithm for evidence appraisal aggregation.EA3:证据评价聚合的 softmax 算法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0253057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253057. eCollection 2021.
7
Symptomatic fever management in children: A systematic review of national and international guidelines.儿童有症状发热的管理:国家和国际指南的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0245815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245815. eCollection 2021.
对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬交替使用与单一疗法在改善发热儿童痛苦及降低难治性发热方面的比较:一项随机对照试验
Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Oct;19(5):479-486. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0237-1.
4
Acetaminophen versus Ibuprofen in Young Children with Mild Persistent Asthma.对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬用于轻度持续性哮喘幼儿的比较
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 18;375(7):619-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515990.
5
Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials II: The quality effects model.异质性临床试验的Meta分析进展II:质量效应模型
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 21.
6
The association of acetaminophen and asthma prevalence and severity.对乙酰氨基酚与哮喘患病率和严重程度的关联。
Pediatrics. 2011 Dec;128(6):1181-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1106. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
7
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
8
Have the efforts to prevent aspirin-related Reye's syndrome fuelled an increase in asthma?预防阿司匹林相关瑞氏综合征的努力是否促使了哮喘发病率的上升?
Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Mar;41(3):296-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03683.x.
9
The role of acetaminophen and geohelminth infection on the incidence of wheeze and eczema: a longitudinal birth-cohort study.对乙酰氨基酚和土源性蠕虫感染在喘息和湿疹发病中的作用:一项纵向出生队列研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan 15;183(2):165-70. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201006-0989OC. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
10
Acetaminophen use and risk of asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in adolescents: International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood Phase Three.对乙酰氨基酚的使用与青少年哮喘、鼻结膜炎和湿疹的风险:儿童哮喘和过敏国际研究第三阶段。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan 15;183(2):171-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201005-0757OC. Epub 2010 Aug 13.