• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项国际德尔菲共识研究,旨在确定健康研究中行为试验方法学研究的优先事项。

An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research.

机构信息

Health Behavior Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.

Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Mar 23;21(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04235-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04235-z
PMID:32293510
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7092577/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-communicable chronic diseases are linked to behavioral risk factors (including smoking, poor diet and physical inactivity), so effective behavior change interventions are needed to improve population health. However, uptake and impact of these interventions is limited by methodological challenges. We aimed to identify and achieve consensus on priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research among an international behavioral science community.

METHODS

An international, Delphi consensus study was conducted. Fifteen core members of the International Behavioral Trials Network (IBTN) were invited to generate methodological items that they consider important. From these, the research team agreed a "long-list" of unique items. Two online surveys were administered to IBTN members (N = 306). Respondents rated the importance of items on a 9-point scale, and ranked their "top-five" priorities. In the second survey, respondents received feedback on others' responses, before rerating items and re-selecting their top five.

RESULTS

Nine experts generated 144 items, which were condensed to a long-list of 33 items. The four most highly endorsed items, in both surveys 1 (n = 77) and 2 (n = 57), came from two thematic categories:"Intervention development" ("Specifying intervention components" and "Tailoring interventions to specific populations and contexts") and "Implementation" ("How to disseminate behavioral trial research findings to increase implementation" and "Methods for ensuring that behavioral interventions are implementable into practice and policy"). "Development of novel research designs to test behavioral interventions" also emerged as a highly ranked research priority.

CONCLUSIONS

From a wide array of identified methodological issues, intervention development, implementation and novel research designs are key themes to drive the future behavioral trials' research agenda. Funding bodies should prioritize these issues in resource allocation.

摘要

背景

非传染性慢性疾病与行为风险因素(包括吸烟、不良饮食和缺乏身体活动)有关,因此需要有效的行为改变干预措施来改善人群健康。然而,这些干预措施的采用和影响受到方法学挑战的限制。我们旨在确定并就国际行为科学界健康研究中行为试验的方法学研究重点达成共识。

方法

进行了一项国际德尔菲共识研究。邀请了国际行为试验网络(IBTN)的 15 名核心成员提出他们认为重要的方法学项目。从这些项目中,研究团队商定了一个“长清单”上的独特项目。对 IBTN 成员(n=306)进行了两次在线调查。受访者根据 9 分制对项目的重要性进行评分,并对他们的“前五名”优先事项进行排名。在第二次调查中,在重新评分和重新选择前五名之前,受访者收到了对他人回应的反馈。

结果

9 名专家提出了 144 个项目,这些项目被压缩成一个 33 个项目的长清单。在两次调查 1(n=77)和 2(n=57)中,两个主题类别中的四个最受支持的项目分别是:“干预措施的开发”(“具体干预措施组成部分”和“针对特定人群和背景调整干预措施”)和“实施”(“如何传播行为试验研究结果以增加实施”和“确保行为干预措施可实施到实践和政策中的方法”)。“开发新型研究设计以测试行为干预措施”也被认为是一个高度优先的研究重点。

结论

从广泛确定的方法学问题中,干预措施的开发、实施和新型研究设计是推动未来行为试验研究议程的关键主题。资助机构应在资源分配中优先考虑这些问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87ab/7092577/36393f48d392/13063_2020_4235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87ab/7092577/36393f48d392/13063_2020_4235_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87ab/7092577/36393f48d392/13063_2020_4235_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research.一项国际德尔菲共识研究,旨在确定健康研究中行为试验方法学研究的优先事项。
Trials. 2020 Mar 23;21(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04235-z.
2
Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Modified Delphi Study.运动报告模板共识(CERT):改良德尔菲研究
Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;96(10):1514-1524. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150668. Epub 2016 May 5.
3
Establishing open science research priorities in health psychology: a research prioritisation Delphi exercise.健康心理学领域的开放科学研究重点制定:一项研究重点德尔菲法实践。
Psychol Health. 2024 Sep;39(9):1218-1242. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2139830. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
4
Setting an International Research Agenda for Fear of Cancer Recurrence: An Online Delphi Consensus Study.为癌症复发恐惧设定国际研究议程:一项在线德尔菲共识研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:596682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596682. eCollection 2021.
5
Towards more credible shams for physical interventions: A Delphi survey.为了使物理干预更可信:德尔菲调查。
Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;17(3):295-305. doi: 10.1177/1740774520910365. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
6
Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study.确定精神卫生领域患者安全的研究重点:一项国际专家德尔菲研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 3;8(3):e021361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021361.
7
Establishing key components of yoga interventions for musculoskeletal conditions: a Delphi survey.确立瑜伽干预肌骨疾病的关键组成部分:德尔菲调查。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Jun 18;14:196. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-196.
8
The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus.德尔菲清单:一份通过德尔菲共识制定的用于系统评价的随机临床试验质量评估标准清单。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;51(12):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00131-0.
9
A DELPHI study priority setting the remaining challenges for the use of routinely collected data in trials: COMORANT-UK.德尔福研究优先考虑了在试验中使用常规收集数据的剩余挑战:COMORANT-UK。
Trials. 2023 Mar 30;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07251-x.
10
The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise.试验方法学研究议程:优先事项设定活动的结果
Trials. 2014 Jan 23;15:32. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Accelerating diabetes innovation for real-world community impact through interdisciplinary research: Who is at the table?通过跨学科研究加速糖尿病创新以实现对现实社区的影响:都有谁参与其中?
Diabet Med. 2025 Jul;42(7):e70057. doi: 10.1111/dme.70057. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
2
Charting the path to the implementation of universal health coverage policy in Nigeria through the lens of Delphi methodology.通过德尔菲法视角探寻尼日利亚全民健康覆盖政策的实施路径。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12201-7.
3
Adapting a Telehealth Physical Activity and Diet Intervention to a Co-Designed Website for Self-Management After Stroke: Tutorial.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of ontologies related to human behaviour change.针对人类行为改变相关本体论的范围综述。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):164-172. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0511-4. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
2
Increasing the impact of behavior change intervention research: Is there a role for stakeholder engagement?增加行为改变干预研究的影响力:利益相关者参与是否有作用?
Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;38(4):290-296. doi: 10.1037/hea0000723.
3
Trial design and methodology for a non-restricted sequential multiple assignment randomized trial to evaluate combinations of perinatal interventions to optimize women's health.
将远程医疗身体活动和饮食干预适应到联合设计的中风后自我管理网站中:教程。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 22;26:e58419. doi: 10.2196/58419.
4
Prioritizing research needs and opportunities at the intersection of implementation science and engagement science.确定实施科学与参与科学交叉领域的研究需求和机遇的优先级。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jul 18;5(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00617-5.
5
Priorities for implementation research on diagnosing cancer in primary care: a consensus process.优先考虑在初级保健中诊断癌症的实施研究:共识过程。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 27;23(1):1308. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10330-z.
6
A multi-step approach to develop a "storytelling" intervention to improve patient gout knowledge and improve outpatient follow-up.一种多步骤方法,用于开发一种“讲故事”干预措施,以提高患者对痛风的认知并改善门诊随访情况。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 May 19;33:101149. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101149. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
From the United Kingdom to Australia-Adapting a Web-Based Self-management Education Program to Support the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Tutorial.从英国到澳大利亚——改编基于网络的自我管理教育计划以支持 2 型糖尿病管理:教程。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e26339. doi: 10.2196/26339.
8
Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences.为什么要以及如何让专家利益相关者参与本体开发:来自社会和行为科学的见解。
J Biomed Semantics. 2021 Mar 23;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13326-021-00240-6.
9
Applying the Multiphase Optimization Strategy for the Development of Optimized Interventions in Palliative Care.运用多阶段优化策略开发姑息治疗中的优化干预措施。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jul;62(1):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
一项非限制序贯多项分配随机试验的设计和方法,旨在评估围产期干预措施的组合,以优化妇女健康。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Apr;79:111-121. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
4
Global health trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise.全球卫生试验方法学研究议程:优先事项设定工作的结果。
Trials. 2018 Feb 5;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2440-y.
5
Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation.将知识转化为行动,以实现更有效的实践、项目和政策:综合知识转化研究计划方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 2;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y.
6
Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used.评估行为改变技术在健康相关行为中的有效性:方法的综述评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):212-224. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx019.
7
Prioritising target behaviours for research in diabetes: Using the nominal group technique to achieve consensus from key stakeholders.确定糖尿病研究的目标行为优先级:运用名义群体技术达成关键利益相关者的共识。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 6;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0028-9. eCollection 2016.
8
The Human Behaviour-Change Project: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and machine learning for evidence synthesis and interpretation.人类行为改变项目:利用人工智能和机器学习的力量进行证据综合和解释。
Implement Sci. 2017 Oct 18;12(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0641-5.
9
Communication of behaviour change interventions: Can they be recognised from written descriptions?行为改变干预措施的交流:能否从书面描述中识别出来?
Psychol Health. 2018 Jun;33(6):713-723. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1385784. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
10
PREDICT prioritisation study: establishing the research priorities of paediatric emergency medicine physicians in Australia and New Zealand.预测优先研究:确定澳大利亚和新西兰儿科急诊医师的研究重点。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jan;35(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206727. Epub 2017 Aug 30.