Clinical Trials Research Centre, Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Academic Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Trials. 2018 Feb 5;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2440-y.
Methodological research into the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of trials is essential to optimise the process. UK specialists in the field have established a set of top priorities in aid of this research. These priorities, however, may not be reflected in the needs of similar research in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) with different healthcare provision, resources and research infrastructure. The aim of the study was to identify the top priorities for methodological research in LMICs to inform further research and ultimately to improve clinical trials in these regions.
An online, two-round survey was conducted from December 2016 to April 2017 amongst researchers and methodologists working on trials in LMICs. The first round required participants to suggest between three and six topics which they felt were priorities for trial methodological research in LMICs. The second round invited participants to grade the importance of a compulsory list of topics suggested by four or more individuals, and an optional list of the remaining topics.
Rounds 1 and 2 were completed by 412 and 314 participants, respectively. A wide spread of years of experience, discipline, current country of residence, origin of trials training and area of involvement in trials was reported. The topics deemed most important for methodological research were: choosing appropriate outcomes to measure and training of research staff.
By presenting these top priorities we have the foundations of a global health trials methodological research agenda which we hope will foster future research in specific areas in order to increase and improve trials in LMICs.
为了优化临床试验的设计、实施、分析和报告过程,对方法学的研究至关重要。英国该领域的专家已经确定了一系列的优先事项,以支持这项研究。然而,这些优先事项可能无法反映出具有不同医疗保健提供、资源和研究基础设施的中低收入国家(LMICs)在类似研究中的需求。本研究旨在确定 LMICs 中方法学研究的首要任务,为进一步的研究提供信息,并最终改善这些地区的临床试验。
2016 年 12 月至 2017 年 4 月,我们对在 LMICs 从事临床试验的研究人员和方法学家进行了在线两轮调查。第一轮要求参与者提出三到六个他们认为是 LMICs 临床试验方法学研究的优先事项。第二轮邀请参与者对四人或四人以上提出的强制性主题清单和可选主题清单的重要性进行评分。
第一轮和第二轮分别有 412 名和 314 名参与者完成。报告的经验年限、学科、当前居住国家、临床试验培训来源和参与试验的领域广泛。被认为对方法学研究最重要的主题是:选择适当的测量结果和研究人员的培训。
通过提出这些优先事项,我们为全球健康试验方法学研究议程奠定了基础,我们希望该议程将促进特定领域的未来研究,以增加和改善 LMICs 的试验。