Health Behaviour Change Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.
Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
J Biomed Semantics. 2021 Mar 23;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13326-021-00240-6.
Incorporating the feedback of expert stakeholders in ontology development is important to ensure content is appropriate, comprehensive, meets community needs and is interoperable with other ontologies and classification systems. However, domain experts are often not formally engaged in ontology development, and there is little available guidance on how this involvement should best be conducted and managed. Social and behavioural science studies often involve expert feedback in the development of tools and classification systems but have had little engagement with ontology development. This paper aims to (i) demonstrate how expert feedback can enhance ontology development, and (ii) provide practical recommendations on how to conduct expert feedback in ontology development using methodologies from the social and behavioural sciences.
Considerations for selecting methods for engaging stakeholders are presented. Mailing lists and issue trackers as existing methods used frequently in ontology development are discussed. Advisory boards and working groups, feedback tasks, consensus exercises, discussions and workshops are presented as potential methods from social and behavioural sciences to incorporate in ontology development.
A variety of methods from the social and behavioural sciences exist to enable feedback from expert stakeholders in ontology development. Engaging domain experts in ontology development enables depth and clarity in ontology development, whilst also establishing advocates for an ontology upon its completion.
在本体开发中纳入专家利益相关者的反馈非常重要,以确保内容合适、全面、满足社区需求并与其他本体和分类系统互操作。然而,领域专家通常没有正式参与本体开发,并且关于如何最好地进行和管理这种参与的指导很少。社会和行为科学研究通常在工具和分类系统的开发中涉及专家反馈,但与本体开发的参与度较低。本文旨在 (i) 展示专家反馈如何增强本体开发,以及 (ii) 提供如何使用社会和行为科学方法在本体开发中进行专家反馈的实用建议。
提出了选择参与利益相关者方法的注意事项。讨论了本体开发中常用的现有方法,如邮件列表和问题跟踪器。提出了顾问委员会和工作组、反馈任务、共识练习、讨论和研讨会等潜在方法,这些方法来自社会和行为科学,可以纳入本体开发中。
存在各种来自社会和行为科学的方法,可以在本体开发中从专家利益相关者那里获得反馈。让领域专家参与本体开发可以在本体开发中实现深度和清晰度,同时在本体完成后也为其建立拥护者。