Department of Histology, Tissue Engineering Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2020 Jun;14(6):789-806. doi: 10.1002/term.3043. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
Nerve autograft is the gold standard technique to repair critical nerve defects, but efficient alternatives are needed. The present study evaluated the suitability of our novel Roosens-based (RSN) decellularized peripheral nerve allografts (DPNAs) in the repair of 10-mm sciatic nerve defect in rats at the functional and histological levels after 12 weeks. These DPNAs were compared with the autograft technique (AUTO) and Sondell (SD) or Hudson (HD) based DPNAs. Clinical and functional assessments demonstrated a partial regeneration in all operated animals. RSN-based DPNAs results were comparable with SD and HD groups and closely comparable with the AUTO group without significant differences (p > .05). Overall hematological studies confirmed the biocompatibility of grafted DPNAs. In addition, biochemistry revealed some signs of muscle affection in all operated animals. These results were confirmed by the loss of weight and volume of the muscle and by muscle histology, especially in DPNAs. Histology of repaired nerves confirmed an active nerve tissue regeneration and partial myelination along with the implanted grafts, being the results obtained with HD and RSN-based DPNAs comparable with the AUTO group. Finally, this in vivo study suggests that our novel RSN-based DPNAs supported a comparable tissue regeneration, along the 10-mm nerve gap, after 12-week follow-up to HD DPNAs, and both were superior to SD group and closely comparable with autograft technique. However, further improvements are needed to overcome the efficacy of the nerve autograft technique.
神经自体移植是修复临界神经缺损的金标准技术,但需要有效的替代方法。本研究在 12 周后从功能和组织学水平评估了我们新型基于 Roosens(RSN)的去细胞周围神经同种异体移植物(DPNAs)在修复大鼠 10mm 坐骨神经缺损中的适用性。这些 DPNAs 与自体移植技术(AUTO)和 Sondell(SD)或 Hudson(HD)基于 DPNAs 进行了比较。临床和功能评估表明,所有手术动物均有部分再生。RSN 为基础的 DPNAs 结果与 SD 和 HD 组相当,与 AUTO 组非常相似,无显著差异(p>.05)。总体血液学研究证实了移植 DPNAs 的生物相容性。此外,生物化学显示所有手术动物的肌肉均有一定程度的损伤。这些结果通过肌肉重量和体积的减轻以及肌肉组织学得到证实,尤其是在 DPNAs 中。修复神经的组织学证实了神经组织的活跃再生和部分髓鞘形成,与植入的移植物一起,HD 和 RSN 为基础的 DPNAs 获得的结果与 AUTO 组相当。最后,这项体内研究表明,我们新型基于 RSN 的 DPNAs 在 12 周的随访后,支持与 HD DPNAs 相当的组织再生,在 10mm 神经间隙内,优于 SD 组,与自体移植技术非常相似。然而,需要进一步改进以克服神经自体移植技术的疗效。