Linares-Gonzalez Laura, Rodenas-Herranz Teresa, Campos Fernando, Ruiz-Villaverde Ricardo, Carriel Víctor
Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Ibs. GRANADA, Instituto Biosanitario de Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Life (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;11(10):1033. doi: 10.3390/life11101033.
Reconstruction of skin defects is often a challenging effort due to the currently limited reconstructive options. In this sense, tissue engineering has emerged as a possible alternative to replace or repair diseased or damaged tissues from the patient's own cells. A substantial number of tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESSs) have been conceived and evaluated in vitro and in vivo showing promising results in the preclinical stage. However, only a few constructs have been used in the clinic. The lack of standardization in evaluation methods employed may in part be responsible for this discrepancy. This review covers the most well-known and up-to-date methods for evaluating the optimization of new TESSs and orientative guidelines for the evaluation of TESSs are proposed.
Life (Basel). 2021-9-30
Herz. 2010-8
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020-10
Curr Opin Urol. 2001-5
J Basic Microbiol. 2024-12
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024-3-27
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022-8-23
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021-1
Biomaterials. 2020-11
Biomolecules. 2020-8-11
Med Eng Phys. 2020-8