Linares-Gonzalez Laura, Rodenas-Herranz Teresa, Campos Fernando, Ruiz-Villaverde Ricardo, Carriel Víctor
Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Ibs. GRANADA, Instituto Biosanitario de Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Life (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;11(10):1033. doi: 10.3390/life11101033.
Reconstruction of skin defects is often a challenging effort due to the currently limited reconstructive options. In this sense, tissue engineering has emerged as a possible alternative to replace or repair diseased or damaged tissues from the patient's own cells. A substantial number of tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESSs) have been conceived and evaluated in vitro and in vivo showing promising results in the preclinical stage. However, only a few constructs have been used in the clinic. The lack of standardization in evaluation methods employed may in part be responsible for this discrepancy. This review covers the most well-known and up-to-date methods for evaluating the optimization of new TESSs and orientative guidelines for the evaluation of TESSs are proposed.
由于目前重建选择有限,皮肤缺损的重建往往是一项具有挑战性的工作。从这个意义上说,组织工程已成为一种可能的替代方法,可利用患者自身细胞替代或修复患病或受损组织。大量组织工程皮肤替代物(TESSs)已在体外和体内构思并评估,在临床前阶段显示出有前景的结果。然而,只有少数构建体已用于临床。所采用的评估方法缺乏标准化可能部分导致了这种差异。本综述涵盖了评估新型TESSs优化的最知名和最新方法,并提出了TESSs评估的指导性准则。