Suppr超能文献

对痴呆症患者启动预先护理计划的促进和阻碍因素的叙述性综述。

A narrative review of facilitating and inhibiting factors in advance care planning initiation in people with dementia.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

NHS Tayside and Dundee Health and Social Care Partnership, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Jun;11(3):353-368. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00314-1. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To identify and assess factors that affect the decisions to initiate advance care planning (ACP) amongst people living with dementia (PwD).

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted. A keyword search of Medline, CINAHL PsycINFO, and Web of Sciences databases produced 22,234 articles. Four reviewers independently applying inclusion/exclusion criteria resulted in 39 articles. Discrepancies were settled in discussion.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight primary studies and eleven review articles remained. Narrative analysis generated five categories of facilitating and inhibitory factors: people with dementia, family orientation, healthcare professionals (HCP), systemic and contextual factors, and time factors. Key facilitators of ACP initiation were (i) healthcare settings with supportive policies and guidelines, (ii) family members and HCPs who have a supportive relationship with PwD, and (iii) HCPs who received ACP education. Key inhibitors were: (i) lack of knowledge about the dementia trajectory in stakeholders, (ii) lack of ACP knowledge, and (iii) unclear timing to initiate an ACP.

CONCLUSION

This review highlighted the main challenges associated with optimal ACP initiation with PwD. To encourage effective ACP initiation with PwD, succinct policies and guidelines for clinical commissioners are needed. ACP also needs to be discussed with family members in an informal, iterative manner. More research is required on initiation timing given the disease trajectory and changing family dynamics.

摘要

研究目的

确定并评估影响痴呆症患者(PwD)启动预先护理计划(ACP)的因素。

研究方法

进行了叙述性综述。对 Medline、CINAHL PsycINFO 和 Web of Sciences 数据库进行了关键字搜索,共产生了 22234 篇文章。四名评审员独立应用纳入/排除标准后,有 39 篇文章入选。有分歧的地方通过讨论解决。

研究结果

保留了 28 项主要研究和 11 项综述文章。叙述性分析产生了五个类别的促进和抑制因素:痴呆症患者、家庭取向、医疗保健专业人员(HCP)、系统和背景因素以及时间因素。ACP 启动的主要促进因素是:(i)有支持性政策和指南的医疗保健环境;(ii)与 PwD 有支持性关系的家庭成员和 HCP;以及(iii)接受 ACP 教育的 HCP。主要的抑制因素包括:(i)利益相关者对痴呆症轨迹的知识不足;(ii)缺乏 ACP 知识;以及(iii)启动 ACP 的时机不明确。

结论

本综述强调了与 PwD 最佳 ACP 启动相关的主要挑战。为了鼓励与 PwD 有效启动 ACP,临床专员需要简洁的政策和指南。还需要以非正式、迭代的方式与家庭成员讨论 ACP。鉴于疾病轨迹和不断变化的家庭动态,需要进一步研究启动时机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7406/7280342/bb8a2abf0bbe/41999_2020_314_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验