Suppr超能文献

OPADIA 研究:患者问卷是否有助于增强医患双方就糖尿病患者身体活动微观目标进行的共同决策?

OPADIA Study: Is a Patient Questionnaire Useful for Enhancing Physician-Patient Shared Decision Making on Physical Activity Micro-objectives in Diabetes?

机构信息

Paris Descartes University of Medicine, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.

Department of Sport Medicine and Functional Explorations, University-Hospital (CHU), G. Montpied Hospital, INRA, UMR 1019, UNH, CRNH Auvergne, Clermont University, University of Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2317-2336. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01336-8. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Regular physical activity (PA) is recommended by all type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management guidelines. The OPADIA study aimed to determine whether using a specific patient questionnaire (Optima-PA©) could help T2DM patients increase their PA by leading to better physician-patient communication and improved levels of shared decision making concerning Specific, Measurable, Acceptable, Realistic, Timely (SMART)-PA micro-objectives.

METHODS

Physicians participating in this multicentre, prospective, randomised, real-life study were allocated to a standard group (T2DM patients managed according to usual clinical practice, n = 24) or the OPTIMA-PA group (additional use of the questionnaire, n = 30). The main outcome was the percentage of inclusion visits ending with the setting up of at least one SMART-PA micro-objective. Other outcomes were the impact of the OPTIMA-PA questionnaire on patient perceptions of shared decision making (ENTRED questionnaire) and the impact of the OPTIMA-PA questionnaire and establishing SMART-PA micro-objectives as well as patient-perceived physician empathy (ENTRED questionnaire) and GP aptitude for patient-centredness (SEPCQ scores) on patient PA levels over a 3-month period (IPAQ-SF scores).

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients were included in the standard group and 134 in the OPTIMA-PA group. Unexpectedly, more inclusion visits ended with SMART-PA micro-objectives being set up in the standard group (p < 0.001): 81.1% (n = 99/122) versus 59.7% (n = 80/134). However, fewer patients in the OPTIMA-PA group felt that GPs made decisions alone (32% versus 60%; p < 0.0001). Positive correlations were also observed between GP patient-centredness and patient-perceived GP empathy or increased patient PA over the study period.

CONCLUSION

Although the OPTIMA-PA questionnaire did not directly promote setting up of SMART-PA micro-objectives in T2DM patients, the OPADIA study demonstrated that this tool was effective at improving patient-physician relationships by increasing patient involvement in therapeutic decision making. Our study also highlighted the importance of GP aptitude for patient-centredness for improving PA in T2DM patients.

摘要

简介

所有 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)管理指南都建议进行有规律的身体活动(PA)。OPADIA 研究旨在确定使用特定的患者问卷(Optima-PA©)是否可以通过改善医患沟通和提高特定、可衡量、可接受、现实、及时(SMART)-PA 微观目标的共享决策水平,帮助 T2DM 患者增加 PA。

方法

参与这项多中心、前瞻性、随机、真实世界研究的医生被分配到标准组(根据常规临床实践管理 T2DM 患者,n=24)或 OPTIMA-PA 组(额外使用问卷,n=30)。主要结果是至少设定一个 SMART-PA 微观目标的纳入就诊百分比。其他结果是 OPTIMA-PA 问卷对患者共享决策感知的影响(ENTRED 问卷)以及 OPTIMA-PA 问卷和设定 SMART-PA 微观目标以及患者感知医生同理心(ENTRED 问卷)和 GP 以患者为中心的能力(SEPCQ 评分)对患者 PA 水平的影响在 3 个月的时间内(IPAQSF 评分)。

结果

122 例患者纳入标准组,134 例纳入 OPTIMA-PA 组。出乎意料的是,标准组更多的纳入就诊结束时设定了 SMART-PA 微观目标(p<0.001):81.1%(n=99/122)与 59.7%(n=80/134)。然而,OPADIA 研究表明,在 OPTIMA-PA 组中,更少的患者认为全科医生独自做出决定(32%对 60%;p<0.0001)。在研究期间,还观察到 GP 以患者为中心与患者感知的 GP 同理心或增加患者 PA 之间存在正相关关系。

结论

尽管 OPTIMA-PA 问卷并未直接促进 T2DM 患者设定 SMART-PA 微观目标,但该研究表明,该工具通过增加患者对治疗决策的参与,有效改善了医患关系。我们的研究还强调了 GP 以患者为中心的能力对改善 T2DM 患者 PA 的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ad9/7467497/0dca38069b93/12325_2020_1336_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验