• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的每日一次基础胰岛素注射的 2 型糖尿病患者依从性检测。

Machine Learning-Based Adherence Detection of Type 2 Diabetes Patients on Once-Daily Basal Insulin Injections.

机构信息

Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, DTU Compute, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

Novo Nordisk A/S, Device R&D, Hillerød, Denmark.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;15(1):98-108. doi: 10.1177/1932296820912411. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1177/1932296820912411
PMID:32297804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7780366/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lack of treatment adherence can lead to life-threatening health complications for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Recent improvements and availability in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology have enabled various possibilities to monitor diabetes treatment. Detection of missed once-daily basal insulin injections can be used to provide feedback to patients, thus improving their diabetes management. In this study, we explore how (ML) based on CGM data can be used for detecting to once-daily basal insulin injections.

METHODS

In-silico CGM data were generated to simulate a cohort of T2D patients on once-daily insulin injection (Tresiba®). methods within ML based on automatic feature extraction including convolutional neural networks were explored and compared with simple feature-engineered ML classification models for adherence detection. It was further investigated whether fused expert-dependent and automatically learned features could improve performance, resulting in a comparison of six different detection models. Adherence was detected throughout each day with an increasing amount of CGM data available.

RESULTS

The adherence detection accuracy improved as more CGM data became available on the day of classification. The three classification models based on expert-engineered features obtained mean accuracies of 78.6%, 78.2%, and 78.3%. The classification model based purely on learned features obtained a mean accuracy of 79.7%. The two classification models fusing expert-engineered and learned features obtained mean accuracies of 79.7% and 79.8%. All the mentioned results were obtained 16 hours after time of injection.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that adherence detection based on CGM data is feasible. Even though our study based on in-silico data indicates only slightly improved performance of more complex models, the question remains whether advanced models would outperform the simple in a real-world setting. Thus, future studies on adherence monitoring using real CGM data are relevant.

摘要

背景

治疗依从性差可能导致 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者出现危及生命的健康并发症。连续血糖监测(CGM)技术的最新改进和可用性使各种监测糖尿病治疗的可能性成为可能。检测漏用一次每日基础胰岛素注射可以为患者提供反馈,从而改善他们的糖尿病管理。在这项研究中,我们探索了如何使用基于 CGM 数据的机器学习(ML)来检测一次每日基础胰岛素注射的漏用情况。

方法

为了模拟一次每日胰岛素注射(Tresiba®)的 T2D 患者队列,生成了基于计算机的 CGM 数据。探索了基于自动特征提取的 ML 中的分类方法,包括卷积神经网络,并将其与基于简单特征工程的 ML 分类模型进行了比较,以进行依从性检测。进一步研究了融合专家依赖和自动学习的特征是否可以提高性能,从而比较了六个不同的检测模型。在每天的每个时间点,随着 CGM 数据的增加,检测依从性。

结果

随着分类日当天 CGM 数据的可用性增加,依从性检测的准确性也随之提高。基于专家设计特征的三个分类模型的平均准确率分别为 78.6%、78.2%和 78.3%。基于纯粹学习特征的分类模型的平均准确率为 79.7%。融合专家设计特征和学习特征的两个分类模型的平均准确率分别为 79.7%和 79.8%。所有提到的结果都是在注射后 16 小时获得的。

结论

结果表明,基于 CGM 数据的依从性检测是可行的。尽管我们的研究基于计算机数据仅表明更复杂的模型的性能略有提高,但仍存在一个问题,即高级模型在实际环境中是否会优于简单模型。因此,使用真实 CGM 数据进行依从性监测的未来研究是相关的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/da9c241eed9b/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/22d18dd16045/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/929092af5521/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/7a3fbd45df7b/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/d668f227a99a/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/5b96f494bb71/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/f73db532642c/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/da9c241eed9b/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/22d18dd16045/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/929092af5521/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/7a3fbd45df7b/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/d668f227a99a/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/5b96f494bb71/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/f73db532642c/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a88d/7782993/da9c241eed9b/10.1177_1932296820912411-fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning-Based Adherence Detection of Type 2 Diabetes Patients on Once-Daily Basal Insulin Injections.基于机器学习的每日一次基础胰岛素注射的 2 型糖尿病患者依从性检测。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;15(1):98-108. doi: 10.1177/1932296820912411. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
A deep learning approach to adherence detection for type 2 diabetics.一种用于检测2型糖尿病患者依从性的深度学习方法。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:2896-2899. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037462.
3
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.基于数据驱动的血糖动力学建模与预测:机器学习在 1 型糖尿病中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.持续血糖监测:近期研究综述显示血糖结果得到改善
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(S3):S25-S37. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0035.
5
Smart Pen Exposes Missed Basal Insulin Injections and Reveals the Impact on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.智能笔揭示1型糖尿病成人患者基础胰岛素注射遗漏情况并显示其对血糖控制的影响。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):66-73. doi: 10.1177/19322968221104142. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
Machine learning-based glucose prediction with use of continuous glucose and physical activity monitoring data: The Maastricht Study.基于连续血糖和身体活动监测数据的机器学习血糖预测:马斯特里赫特研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253125. eCollection 2021.
7
Glycemic, maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring during pregnancy - Pump vs multiple daily injections, a secondary analysis of an observational cohort study.妊娠期使用连续血糖监测的 1 型糖尿病女性的血糖、母婴结局 - 泵 vs 多次每日注射:一项观察性队列研究的二次分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 May;100(5):927-933. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14039. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
Treatment satisfaction and quality of life for an integrated continuous glucose monitoring/insulin pump system compared to self-monitoring plus an insulin pump.与自我血糖监测加胰岛素泵相比,一体化持续葡萄糖监测/胰岛素泵系统的治疗满意度和生活质量。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 1;3(6):1402-10. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300621.
9
Optimization of insulin regimen and glucose outcomes with short-term real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) in type 1 diabetic children with sub-optimal glucose control on multiple daily injections: The pediatric DIACCOR study.在采用多次皮下注射治疗但血糖控制欠佳的1型糖尿病儿童中,通过短期实时动态血糖监测(RT-CGM)优化胰岛素治疗方案及血糖转归:儿科DIACCOR研究
Arch Pediatr. 2019 Feb;26(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2018.11.010. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
10
Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.儿科年龄组的糖尿病技术与治疗
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Feb(170):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02582.x.

引用本文的文献

1
CGM Data Analysis 2.0: Functional Data Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence Applications.连续血糖监测数据分析2.0:功能数据模式识别与人工智能应用
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 14:19322968251353228. doi: 10.1177/19322968251353228.
2
AI Applications for Chronic Condition Self-Management: Scoping Review.人工智能在慢性病自我管理中的应用:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 8;27:e59632. doi: 10.2196/59632.
3
A Review on Deep Learning for Quality of Life Assessment Through the Use of Wearable Data.基于可穿戴数据的深度学习用于生活质量评估的综述

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes Healthcare Professionals Use Multiple Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Indicators to Assess Glucose Management.糖尿病医护专业人员使用多种连续血糖监测数据指标来评估血糖管理。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Mar;14(2):271-276. doi: 10.1177/1932296819873641. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
2
Feasibility of a New Approach to Initiate Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes.新方法在 2 型糖尿病起始胰岛素治疗中的可行性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):339-345. doi: 10.1177/1932296819900240. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
3
Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range.
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2025 Jan 14;6:261-268. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2025.3526457. eCollection 2025.
4
Recent applications of machine learning and deep learning models in the prediction, diagnosis, and management of diabetes: a comprehensive review.机器学习和深度学习模型在糖尿病预测、诊断及管理中的最新应用:一项全面综述
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Dec 27;14(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00969-9.
5
Hard Voting Ensemble Approach for the Detection of Type 2 Diabetes in Mexican Population with Non-Glucose Related Features.基于非血糖相关特征的墨西哥人群2型糖尿病检测的硬投票集成方法
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;10(8):1362. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081362.
临床连续血糖监测数据解读目标:时间范围国际共识推荐意见。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
4
A guide to deep learning in healthcare.深度学习在医疗保健中的应用指南。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):24-29. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
5
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0033. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
6
Diabetes Technology Update: Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital.糖尿病技术更新:医院中胰岛素泵和连续血糖监测的使用。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1579-1589. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0002. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
7
Continuous glucose monitoring: transforming diabetes management step by step.持续血糖监测:逐步改变糖尿病管理方式。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1334-1336. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30290-3. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
8
International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.连续血糖监测应用的国际共识
Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1631-1640. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1600.
9
A deep learning approach to adherence detection for type 2 diabetics.一种用于检测2型糖尿病患者依从性的深度学习方法。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:2896-2899. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037462.
10
Continuous glucose monitoring: A review of the technology and clinical use.持续葡萄糖监测:技术与临床应用综述
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;133:178-192. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 1.