Tumor Immunology Lab, Department of Pathology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Pathology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Immunol. 2020 Jul;92(1):e12889. doi: 10.1111/sji.12889. Epub 2020 May 10.
The analysis of tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) has a high potential to predict cancer recurrence and response to immunotherapy. However, the heterogeneity of TAMs poses a challenge for quantitative and qualitative measurements. Here, we critically evaluated by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry two commonly used pan-macrophage markers (CD14 and CD68) as well as some suggested markers for tumour-promoting M2 macrophages (CD163, CD204, CD206 and CD209) in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tumour, non-cancerous lung tissue and blood were investigated. For immunohistochemistry, CD68 was confirmed to be a useful pan-macrophage marker although careful selection of antibody was found to be critical. The widely used anti-CD68 antibody clone KP-1 stains both macrophages and neutrophils, which is problematic for TAM quantification because lung tumours contain many neutrophils. For TAM counting in tumour sections, we recommend combined labelling of CD68 with a cell membrane marker such as CD14, CD163 or CD206. In flow cytometry, the commonly used combination of CD14 and HLA-DR was found to not be optimal because some TAMs do not express CD14. Instead, combined staining of CD68 and HLA-DR is preferable to gate all TAMs. Concerning macrophage phenotypic markers, the scavenger receptor CD163 was found to be expressed by a substantial fraction (50%-86%) of TAMs with a large patient-to-patient variation. Approximately 50% of TAMs were positive for CD206. Surprisingly, there was no clear overlap between CD163 and CD206 positivity, and three distinct TAM sub-populations were identified in NSCLC tumours: CD163 CD206 , CD163 CD206 and CD163 CD206 . This work should help develop macrophage-based prognostic tools for cancer.
肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAMs)的分析具有预测癌症复发和对免疫治疗反应的高潜力。然而,TAMs 的异质性对定量和定性测量构成了挑战。在这里,我们通过免疫组织化学和流式细胞术对两种常用的全巨噬细胞标志物(CD14 和 CD68)以及一些被认为与肿瘤促进 M2 巨噬细胞相关的标志物(CD163、CD204、CD206 和 CD209)进行了批判性评估,用于人类非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。研究了肿瘤、非癌性肺组织和血液。对于免疫组织化学,发现 CD68 是一种有用的全巨噬细胞标志物,尽管仔细选择抗体被认为是关键的。广泛使用的抗 CD68 抗体克隆 KP-1 染色巨噬细胞和中性粒细胞,这对于 TAM 定量是有问题的,因为肺肿瘤含有许多中性粒细胞。对于肿瘤切片中的 TAM 计数,我们建议将 CD68 与细胞膜标志物(如 CD14、CD163 或 CD206)联合标记。在流式细胞术中,发现常用的 CD14 和 HLA-DR 组合不是最佳的,因为一些 TAMs不表达 CD14。相反,CD68 和 HLA-DR 的联合染色更适合于门控所有 TAMs。关于巨噬细胞表型标志物,发现吞噬受体 CD163 被相当一部分(50%-86%)的 TAMs表达,并且患者之间存在很大的变异性。大约 50%的 TAMs 阳性表达 CD206。令人惊讶的是,CD163 和 CD206 的阳性之间没有明显的重叠,并且在 NSCLC 肿瘤中鉴定出三个不同的 TAM 亚群:CD163 CD206、CD163 CD206 和 CD163 CD206。这项工作应该有助于开发基于巨噬细胞的癌症预后工具。